Acta Law Journal
type: channel
description: <img src="[binary]" /> Acta Law Journal (E-ISSN: 2964-2264) is a peer-reviewed journal published since 2022 by Magister Kenotariatan (Master of Notarial Law), Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. Acta Law Journal is published twice a year in June and December. Acta Law Journal publishes works that cover conceptual papers and research findings of legal academics and practitioners. Articles published in Acta Law Journal does not only focus on issues related to Notarial studies, but also general law studies. As a national journal, Acta Law Journal accepts contributions of writings nationally on topics related to various fields of law. In order to maintain the quality of articles to be published by Acta Law Journal, a number of law professors and legal experts have been appointed as editorial boards. Every article published is confirmed to have been through the review stage in accordance with the standards that apply to a scientific journal. The reviewers are selected from legal experts in accordance with their scientific fields. Acta Law Journal (E-ISSN: 2964-2264) is a peer-reviewed journal published twice a year (June and December) by the Master of Notarial Law program at Universitas Sumatera Utara. It covers notarial and general law studies, publishing research and conceptual papers by legal academics and practitioners. Articles undergo a rigorous review process by legal experts to ensure quality. Journal title Acta Law Journal Subjects Notarial Law, General Law Studies Language English, Indonesia E-ISSN 2964-2264 Frequency 2 issues per year (June and December) DOI 10.32734 - by Crossref OAI https://talenta.usu.ac.id/ALJ/oai Editor-in-chief Dr. Detania Sukarja, S.H., LL.M. Publisher TALENTA Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara Cititation Analysis Google Scholars Acta Law Journal has been indexed by: In Collaboration With:
publisher: Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara
language: en-US
publication name: Acta Law Journal
issn: 2964-2264
items: Efektivitas Penerapan Perubahan Perilaku Oleh Kppu Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Penentuan Layanan Kurir Di Platform Shopee
items: Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Bukti Elektronik: Antara Eksistensi, Hambatan Penggunaan, dan Urgensi Pengaturannya Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
items: Bagaimana Memperbaiki Undang-Undang Hak Cipta
items: Penyalahgunaan Kedudukan Komisaris Pt. Condato Grup Indonesia Sebagai Tindakan Ultra Vires (Studi Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Jkt.Pst)
items: Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Terkait Pelanggaran Hak Cipta “Urban Light” (Studi Putusan No 31/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2020/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)

Efektivitas Penerapan Perubahan Perilaku Oleh Kppu Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Penentuan Layanan Kurir Di Platform Shopee
type: item
description: Market dominance practices, particularly discriminatory conduct, are prohibited under Article 19 letter d of Law No. 5 of 1999, while the abuse of dominant position is prohibited under Article 25 of the same law. In addressing such violations, the Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) issued KPPU Regulation No. 2 of 2023 as a legal framework aimed at resolving business competition disputes more effectively. This study focuses on KPPU Case Decision No. 04/KPPU-I/2024, involving PT Shopee International Indonesia and PT Nusantara Ekspres Kilat, in relation to alleged discriminatory conduct through algorithmic arrangements prioritizing certain delivery service providers. The method employed in this research and writing is normative legal research with a descriptive approach. The data used comprises primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection was carried out through literature review and analyzed using qualitative normative data analysis techniques. The conclusion shows that the reported parties successfully implemented their commitments to behavioral change through a Behavioral Change Integrity Pact, in accordance with the mechanisms outlined in KPPU Regulation No. 2 of 2023. This success marks the first case to have effectively applied the mechanism under the new regulation, demonstrating its effectiveness in encouraging businesses to compete fairly and in accordance with prevailing regulations. It is recommended that KPPU take a more proactive role in disseminating information and educating the Indonesian E-Commerce Association. Furthermore, KPPU must remain consistent in monitoring the implementation of the Behavioral Change Integrity Pact, including regular oversight and evaluation of the Compliance Programs undertaken by the reported parties. These measures aim to enhance business actors understanding and compliance in resolving alleged competition law violations effectively, thereby promoting healthier competition in Indonesia’s e-commerce …
creator: Kathrin Hutapea
creator: Ningrum Natasya Sirait
creator: Tri Murti Lubis
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Kathrin Hutapea https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
date: 2025-07-20
publication date: 2025-07-20
volume: 3
number: 2
starting page: 63
ending page: 78

Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Bukti Elektronik: Antara Eksistensi, Hambatan Penggunaan, dan Urgensi Pengaturannya Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
type: item
description: The rapid development of technology has resulted in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) not being able to accommodate criminal acts related to technology. In response to these conditions, the government issued Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions which introduced electronic evidence as legal evidence. This recognition is also found in other special laws. However, scattered confessions have created uncertainty regarding the legal position of electronic evidence in the criminal justice system. As a result, the use of electronic evidence is less than optimal in the process of proving and resolving criminal cases. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the existence of electronic evidence as a valid form of evidence in Indonesia, then to identify obstacles to the use of electronic evidence in criminal justice in Indonesia and examine the urgency of regulating electronic evidence as a criminal law policy in criminal justice in Indonesia. The research method in this journal is normative legal research with a statutory regulation approach, comparative approach, case approach and historical approach.. The author uses secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature study, then analyzed qualitatively. This research examines the position of electronic evidence in various special laws and its application in court decisions, then identifies obstacles related to procedures, understanding of law enforcement officials, and limited infrastructure, as well as explaining the urgency of ratifying the draft criminal procedure code (RKUHAP) to strengthen the legal basis for electronic evidence. The results of this research show that electronic evidence needs to be regulated in Indonesian criminal procedural law through updating the Criminal Procedure Code in order to provide legal certainty and facilitate the use of elec…
creator: Gebby Cantika
creator: Edi Yunara
creator: Wessy Trisna
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 gebby cantika, Edi Yunara, Wessy Trisna https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
date: 2025-07-27
publication date: 2025-07-27
volume: 3
number: 2
starting page: 103
ending page: 125

Bagaimana Memperbaiki Undang-Undang Hak Cipta
type: item
description: Akhir-akhir ini, ruang publik dipenuhi perdebatan mengenai hak cipta, terutama dipicu oleh konflik antara para pencipta lagu yang tergabung dalam AKSI dan para penyanyi dari VISI. Perselisihan ini mencuat akibat sejumlah peristiwa sebelumnya, seperti polemik antara Rieka Roslan dan The Groove, Once dan Ahmad Dhani, hingga Posan Tobing dan Kotak. Uniknya, kedua belah pihak sama-sama menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta sebagai dasar argumentasi, bahkan sering merujuk pada pasal yang sama dengan penafsiran berbeda. Fenomena ini menunjukkan adanya celah dalam konstruksi hukum hak cipta yang memungkinkan multitafsir. Artikel ini tidak bertujuan untuk membahas konflik personal, melainkan mengajak pembaca mengkaji akar masalahnya dan mendorong penyusunan revisi UU Hak Cipta secara komprehensif. Metode ROCCIPI (Rule, Opportunity, Capacity, Communication, Interest, Process, Ideology) ditawarkan sebagai pendekatan analitis dalam menyusun Naskah Akademik dan Rancangan Undang-Undang yang lebih inklusif dan adil. Artikel ini juga menekankan pentingnya peran akademisi hukum dalam proses legislasi, agar produk hukum tidak lagi dikendalikan oleh kepentingan sempit kelompok tertentu, tetapi benar-benar mencerminkan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh pemangku kepentingan.
creator: Agus Sardjono
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Agus Sardjono https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
date: 2025-07-20
publication date: 2025-07-20
volume: 3
number: 2
starting page: 92
ending page: 102

Penyalahgunaan Kedudukan Komisaris Pt. Condato Grup Indonesia Sebagai Tindakan Ultra Vires (Studi Putusan Nomor 352/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Jkt.Pst)
type: item
description: Abstract The board of commissioners acts as a supervisor and advisor to the board of directors. Commissioners who use their position to provide advice to the board of directors so that the commissioners can take action on behalf of the company without any authority constitute an act of abuse of the commissioner's position to take ultra vires actions. As illustrated in the case of PT. Condato Grup Indonesia (PT.CGI) in Decision Number 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst, the commissioners of PT. CGI took action to transfer payments from consumers to their supplier companies and withhold PT. CGI's profits. This study uses a normative legal research method, with a statutory, case and conceptual approach, through a literature study data collection technique that collects data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials as analyzed using a qualitative analysis approach. Where several legal issues will be studied, namely how ultra vires actions carried out by commissioners can be categorized as abuse of position, how the judge's considerations in deciding whether the elements of an unlawful act in Decision Number 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst are fulfilled, and how the legal analysis is of the view that the commissioners of PT. CGI have committed ultra vires actions. This study concludes that commissioners who abuse their positions to influence the board of directors are ultra vires actions, as commissioners of PT. CGI have committed unlawful acts by abusing their authority to divert and withhold the company's profits ultra vires. In this case, ultra vires actions are the cause of the losses incurred by PT. CGI. Therefore, the commissioners are obliged to bear all losses, considering that the consequences of ultra vires actions are not binding on the company because they are null and void and trigger the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil. Keywords: Position of Commissioner; Abuse; Ultra Vires. Abstrak Dewan komisaris berkedudukan sebagai pen…
creator: Muhamamd Dafi Tanjung
creator: Mahmul Siregar
creator: Robert
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Dafi Muhammad, Mahmul Siregar, Robert https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
date: 2025-07-20
publication date: 2025-07-20
volume: 3
number: 2
starting page: 79
ending page: 91

Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum Terkait Pelanggaran Hak Cipta “Urban Light” (Studi Putusan No 31/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2020/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)
type: item
description: This study aims to analyze the legal considerations related to copyright infringement in the case of "Urban Light," as presented in decision number 31/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. This case involves a lawsuit filed by Nancy J. Rubins, the heir of the creator of the artwork "Urban Light," Chris Burden, against Defendant I, PT Pasti Makan Enak, and Defendant II, Henry Husada, who are accused of copying and modifying the artwork into the installation "Love Light" without permission.In this research, the author examines the legal framework of copyright in Indonesia, the legal considerations made by the judges in deciding the dispute, and the existing legal protection efforts. The findings indicate that Law No. 28 of 2014 provides automatic protection to creators for works that have been realized, encompassing both economic rights and moral rights. The judges considered the position of the Plaintiff as the legitimate heir, the substantial similarity between the two works, and the impact of the infringement on the creator's reputation.The court's decision to grant the Plaintiff's lawsuit emphasizes the importance of protecting copyright and the moral rights of creators, as well as providing a deterrent effect for violators. This study concludes that copyright protection in Indonesia needs to be enhanced through public education, improved law enforcement, and encouragement for the registration of creative works. Thus, it is hoped that a more conducive environment for the development of art and creativity, as well as respect for copyright, can be established in society.
creator: Bunga Raudah
creator: Saidin
creator: Faradila Yulistari Sitepu
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Bunga Raudah, Saidin, Fardila Sitepu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
date: 2025-07-28
publication date: 2025-07-28
volume: 3
number: 2
starting page: 126
ending page: 134