Legal Protection Of Finance Companies Through The Withdrawal Of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects in Multipurpose Financing Agreements

Authors

  • Habibah Indah Rehulina Sebayang Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Tan Kamello Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Utary Maharani Barus Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Yefrizawaty Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v2i2.13194

Keywords:

Legal Protection , Financing Company, Fiduciary

Abstract

A finance company is a form of business in the non-bank financial sector which is carried out in the form of providing funds or capital goods and in conducting financing requires the existence of a guarantee, namely the motorized vehicle itself as collateral. Finance companies as creditors require a guarantee from the debtor. The formulation of the problem in this study is how to withdraw fiduciary guarantee objects in multipurpose financing agreements for motorized vehicles at finance companies, how is the legal protection for finance companies in consumer financing business activities in multipurpose financing agreements for motorized vehicles.The method used in this thesis research is descriptive normative legal research. The approach method used is the case approach. The data sources used consist of secondary data and are supported by primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Writing research through regulations and legal materials related to this research.The results of the study explain that the withdrawal of fiduciary guarantee objects in multipurpose financing agreements for motorized vehicles at finance companies can be carried out parate executie to objects of fiduciary guarantees. Legal protection for finance companies in consumer financing business activities in multipurpose financing agreements for motorized vehicles is carried out preventively or repressively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Zainuddin, Legal Research Methods. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics, 2016.

Anjum, S., 2014. Quantification of fiduciary risks: Islamic sources of funds, neo-institutionalism and SARWAR Bank. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 2(1), pp.31-57.

Duagi, G., 2018. The fiduciary relations under the Romanian law. Accounting and Management Information Systems AMIS 2018, p.447.

Fuady, Munir, Fiduciary Guarantee, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2018.

Hadjon, Philipus M, Legal Protection for the Indonesian People, Surabaya: Knowledge Development, 2015.

Harahap, M.Yahya, Fiduciary Institution, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2016..

Jabar, Abdul, Additional Agreement (Accessoir) with Mortgage Objects as a Means of Creditor Protection. Journal of Interest, 96, October 2017.

Johan, S., 2021. Implementation Fiduciary Registration According to Finance Ministry, Police, and Financial Services Authority (OJK). The Winners, 22(2), pp.183-189.

Johan, S., 2023. The Difference between Leasing, Loans and Financing Referring to the Law and Regulations. Simbur Cahaya, 30(1), pp.32-44.

Kamello, Tan, Fiduciary Guarantee Law, A Coveted Need. Bandung: Alumni, 2022.

Kosasih, J.I., 2021. Lawsuit for Unlawful Acts of Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees in Lease Activities. Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 1(2), pp.109-118.

Laby, A.B., 2004. Resolving Conflicts of Duty in Fiduciary Relationships. Am. UL Rev., 54, p.75.

Laksana, F., Juwana, H., Sugianto, F. and Manullang, S.O., Legal Certainty Parate Execution Of Fiduciary Guarantees After The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 (Material Examination Of Article 15 Paragraphs (2) And (3) Law Number 42 Of 1999 About Fiduciary Guarantee).

Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority.

Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.

Lombogia, Resty Femi, Development of Fiduciary Guarantee Institutions in Indonesia. Lex Privatetum, 42, October 2018.

Markum, M., Widhiyanti, H.N. and Widiarto, A.E., 2021. Legal Consequences of Fiduciary Guarantee Execution Post Decision of Indonesian Constitutional Court. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(8), pp.218-230.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Moleong, Lexy. J, Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth, 2013.

Nugroho, A., Sara, R. and Riswadi, R., 2023, February. Copyright as Object of Fiduciary Guarantee Based on Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyrights. In Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, 12 November 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.

Pitanuki, N.H.M.P., 2020. Executions of Fiduciaryry Guarantee Post Constitutional Court Decision No. Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. Constitutionale, 1(2), pp.123-138.

Presidential Regulation Number 9 of 2009 concerning Financing Institutions.

Prodjodikoro, R. Wirjono, Principles of Agreement Law. Bandung, 2016.

Putri, I.D., Handayani, I.G.A.K.R., Muryanto, Y.T., Ritonga, R.Z. and Boong, V.R., 2022. Forms of Legal Protection for Lessors in Leasing Agreements After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Journal of World Science, 1(6), pp.422-437.

Regulation of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35/POJK.05/2018 Concerning the Implementation of Financing Company Business

Regulation of the Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2011 concerning Safeguarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees.

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 25 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Registration, Amendment and Abolition of Fiduciary Guarantees.

Runtulalo, M.J. and Tanawijaya, H., 2022, April. Legal Protection for Creditors Against the Destruction of Fiduciary Guarantee (Case Study: Decision Number 26/PDT. GS/2020/PN. RAP). In 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021) (pp. 1349-1355). Atlantis Press.

Satrio, J., Guarantee Law, Fiduciary Guarantee Rights, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Sharia, Rabiatul, Fiduciary Law No. 42 of 1999 Brings Changes in Guarantee Institutions. Medan: USU digital library, 2004.

Siamat, Dahlan, Management of Financial Institutions. Jakarta: Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, 2011.

Sinamo, Nomensen, Legal Research Methods in Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Prosperous Intitama Earth, 2010.

Soekanto, Soerjono., Sri Mamudji, Normative Legal Research. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo, 2011.

Sunggono, Bambang, Legal Research Methodology. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.

Tiong, Oey Hoey, Fiduciary as Collateral for the Elements of the Engagement, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2006

Trimulyo, Setiato. Implementation of Consumer Financing Agreements and Default Implications for Guaranteed Objects (a case study at PT. Oto Multiartha Mataram Branch). Journal of IUS , 85, April 2017.

Utomo, Darmawan Tri Budi "Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees After the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 at the Semarang District Court", Meta-Yuridis Journal, Vol (5) No.2 September 2022

Wahid, S.H. and Mahsun, H.M., 2021. Implication Juridical Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Concerning Wanprestasi In the Fiducia Agreement. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 3(1), pp.12-21.

Wijayanti, R. and Vanni, K.M., 2019. Fiduciary Dispute Settlement of Murabaha Contract in PT. Al-Ijarah Indonesia Finance. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 2(2), pp.178-192.

Witanto, DY., Fiduciary Guarantee Law in Consumer Financing Agreements. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2015

Published

2023-08-28

How to Cite

Sebayang, H. I. R., Kamello, T., Barus, U. M., & Yefrizawaty. (2023). Legal Protection Of Finance Companies Through The Withdrawal Of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects in Multipurpose Financing Agreements. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 2(2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v2i2.13194