Rights of Restitution to Child Victims Under Law No. 35 of 2014 Concerning Child Protection

Authors

  • Lidya Rahmadani Hasibuan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Syaravina Lubis University of Bristol, Inggirs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v3i01.15455

Abstract

Restitution is the compensation paid by a perpetrator, as determined by a court with a final legal decision, to cover the material and/or immaterial losses suffered by the victim or their heirs. In cases involving child victims, restitution becomes obligatory for the perpetrator to compensate the victim for their losses. This demonstrates the perpetrator's responsibility for actions that have harmed the victim, their family, or heirs, in accordance with Article 71 D Paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2014, which amends Law number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. Restitution, as a form of compensation for victims of crimes, aligns with the Principle of Restoration to its Original Condition (restitutio in integrum), aiming to restore victims to their state before the crime, although complete restoration may not be possible. It emphasizes a holistic recovery approach, addressing various aspects resulting from the crime's consequences. Through restitution, victims can recover their freedom, legal rights, social status, family life, citizenship, residence, employment, and assets. The research will be conducted at the Belawan Police, Medan LPSK, and Bagan Deli Belawan Village.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggara, "Purpose of Punishment" in http://anggara.files.wordpress.com. accessed on Sunday 03 March 2013 at 11.00 WIB

Apong Herlina, Paper on Handling Children in Conflict with the Law, Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI), 2012

Barda Nawawi Arief, 1992. Anthology of Criminal Law, Bandung: Alumni.

Bismar Siregar, 1986. Law and Children's Rights, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

HB. Sutopo, 2002, Qualitative Research Methodology, Sebelas Maret University Press, Surakarta.

John EB Myers, 2006. Child Protection in America: Past, Present and Future, New York: Oxford University Press.

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System

Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning Children's Courts

Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Prot

Maidin Gultom, 2008. Legal Protection of Children in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Marlina, 2009. Juvenile Criminal Justice in Indonesia, Development of the Concept of Diversion and Restorative Justice, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Marlina, 2010. Introduction to the Concept of Diversion and Restorative Justice in Criminal Law, Stabat: USU Press.

Norman K. Dezin, 1973. Children and their Cartakers, New Jersey: Transaction Books Rutgers University.

Rini Utami Azis, 2006. Don't Let Our Children Behave Deviantly, Solo: Tiga Serangkai.

Riza Alifianto Kurniawan, "The Principle of Ultimum Remedium in the Punishment of Naughty Children" in http://journal.lib.unair.ac.id accessed on Sunday 03 March 2013 at 11.00 WIB

Sudarto, 2006. Capita Selecta Criminal Law, Bandung: Alumni.

Sumaryono, 1995. Ethics of the Legal Profession, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Tempo, “Highest City Status for Children in Conflict with the Law”http://www.tempo.coaccessed on Sunday 03 March 2013 at 11.00 WIB

Travis Hirschi, 2009. Causes of Delinquency, New Jersey: Transactional Publishers.

Wagiati Soetodjo, 2008. Child Criminal Law, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Hasibuan, L. R., & Lubis, S. (2024). Rights of Restitution to Child Victims Under Law No. 35 of 2014 Concerning Child Protection. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 3(01), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v3i01.15455