The Validity of QR-Code Digital Signature in Contract Towards The Evidence Agenda In Civil Court

Authors

  • Syarifah Lisa Andriati Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Dinda Aprilia Batubara Universitas Sumatera Utara

Abstract

This study delves into the validity of QR-Code Digital Signatures in contractual agreements within the framework of positive law in Indonesia, specifically examining their significance in the evidence agenda of Civil Courts. The objective is to assess the legal provisions surrounding QR-Code Digital Signatures and their potential role as substantial evidence in legal proceedings. By investigating the positive law perspective in Indonesia, the study aims to provide insights for legal practitioners and the public, emphasizing the strategic utilization of QR-Code Digital Signatures to enhance the authenticity of contracts and their admissibility as evidence in Civil Courts. Through this comprehensive exploration, the study aspires to offer a nuanced understanding of the legal standing of QR-Code Digital Signatures, providing valuable insights that contribute to the ongoing dialogue on the intersection of technology and law in the Indonesian context. This research uses normative juridical methods. The result of this research is the QR-Code Digital Signature in the contract is declared valid in positive law in Indonesia. Contracts with QR-Code Digital Signatures can be used as evidence if they meet the requirements in article 11 of the UU ITE. The existence of contracts with QR-Code Digital Signature as valid evidence in court still requires evidentiary arrangements in formal civil law to systematically regulate the process of proof in court so cannot violate the principle of openness of evidence at trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Budianto, Shinta Pangesti. Debora Pasaribu, Stephanie Faustina,’Barcoding Digital Signature Authencity Sebagai Alat Bukti Perkara Pidana’, REFLEKSI HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5(2) (2021).

Alfikri, “Tutorial Membuat Tanda Tangan Digital/Elektronik (Digital Signatur/TTE) Menggunakan Barcode Untuk Cek Keaslian File Dengan CodeIgniter 3 Dan JsignPdf,” Klimikcode, DOI: https://klinikcode.com/tutorial/tutorial-membuat-tanda-tangan-digital-elektronik-digital-signatur-tte-menggunakan-barcode-untuk-cek-keaslian-file-dengan-codeigniter-3-dan-jsignpdf

Alfikri, “Tutorial Membuat Tanda Tangan Digital/Elektronik (Digital Signatur/TTE) Menggunakan Barcode Untuk Cek Keaslian File Dengan CodeIgniter 3 Dan JsignPdf,” Klimikcode, diakses tanggal 11 Mei 14.59 DOI: https://klinikcode.com/tutorial/tutorial-membuat-tanda-tangan-digital-elektronik-digital-signatur-tte-menggunakan-barcode-untuk-cek-keaslian-file-dengan-codeigniter-3-dan-jsignpdf

Arrianto Mukti Wibowo,dkk. (1999). Kerangka Hukum Digital Signature Dalam Electronic Commerce. Depok : Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Unversitas Indonesia.

Budianto, A., Pangesti, S., Pasaribu, D., & Faustina, S. (2021). BARCODING DIGITAL SIGNATURE AUTHENCITY SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI PERKARA PIDANA. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p255-274

Efa Laela Fakhriah, (2015), Perkembangan Alat Bukti Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Menuju Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata, Jurnal Hukum AcaraPerdata Adhaper, 1(2)

Efa Laela Fakhriah, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata (Refika Meditama, 2017)

Fakhriah, E. L. (2015). Perkembangan alat bukti dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di pengadilan menuju pembaruan hukum acara perdata. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 1(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/ 10.36913/jhaper.v1i2.16.

Fatich Fazlur Rochman, Indra Kharisma Raharjana , Taufik. “Implementation of QR Code and Digital Signature to Determine the Validity of KRS and KHS Documents.” Scientific Journal of Informatics Vol. 4, no. 1 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v4i1.7198

Fatich Fazlur Rochman, Indra Kharisma Raharjana, Taufik. (2017). Implementation of QR Code and Digital Signature to Determine the Validity of KRS and KHS Documents. Scientific Journal of Informatics 4(1)

Privy, (2021) “Tanda Tangan Elektronik Vs Tanda Tangan Digital,” Privy.id, DOI: https://blog.privy.id/tanda-tangan-elektronik-vs-tanda-tangan-digital/

Rochman, F. F, Indra K. R, Taufik. (2017) ‘Implementation of QR Code and Digital Signature to Determine the Validity of KRS and KHS Documents’, Scientific Journal of Infor

matics 4(1)

Stallings, W. (2017). Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice. Pearson.

Subekti, R. Tjitrosudibio. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka,2017.

UCL. Digital Signatures . Institute of Education, 2017

Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE).

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE).

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1997 tentang Dokumen Perusahaan.

Wibowo, A. M., Makarim, E., Yuristiawan, H., Aulia, M., Sundoro, E., Helena, L., ... & Gaby, P. K. (1999). Kerangka Hukum Digital Signature Dalam Electronic Commerce. Bogor, Jawa Barat.

Published

2024-08-21

How to Cite

Andriati, S. L., & Aprilia Batubara, D. . (2024). The Validity of QR-Code Digital Signature in Contract Towards The Evidence Agenda In Civil Court. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 3(2), 95-102. Retrieved from https://talenta.usu.ac.id/Mahadi/article/view/17732