Analisis Hukum Tentang Kepentingan Umum Menurut Pasal 310 Ayat (3) KUHP di Indonesia sebagai Alasan Penghapusan Pidana dalam Kegiatan Pers

Authors

  • Aditya Pranata Kaban Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • M. Hamdan Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Budiman Ginting Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Mahmud Mulyadi Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i2.8754

Keywords:

Public Interest; the press freedom; article 310 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code.

Abstract

The public interest is the foundation of any norms and rules of law in force in the Republic of Indonesia. It’s because the public interest is most important than others, such as the interests of the state, the interest of a group, and the interests of the individual, after that the public interest is the reason for removing the offense if it can be proved that the punishable act was done in the public interests, in accordance with Article 310 Paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code. As we all know the activities of the Press often cause problems where the press is considered a crime to make " the public interest" an excuse for his actions, regardless of whether the source of the news is true or not. In press activities, other legislation that serves as the founding members of the press to make an article is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number. 40 of 1999 on the Press, which regulates the press freedom (sometimes called freedom of the press). Those two things make the press feel that the offense should be resolved by way of press releases, and no longer use the Code as a legal basis. In other words, the Press Act serves as Lex specialis of the Code of Penal Code (Code) in the case of defamation, detraction, and mockery, as well as to resolve disputes with other press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atmadi, T., Sistem Pers Indonesia, Jakarta : Gunung Agung, 1985.

Farid, A. Zainal Abidin., Hukum Pidana I, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 1995.

Kode Etik Jurnalistik.

Mas, Marwan., Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Bina Aksara, 1987.

Pandjaitan, Hinca IP., Gunakan Hak Jawab, Hak Koreksi & Kewajiban Anda, Ombudsman Memfasilitasinya, Jakarta : Tim Ombudsman Jawa Pos Grup, 2004.

Peraturan Dewan Pers Nomor: 4/Peraturan-DP/III/2008 Tentang Standar Perusahaan Pers.

Poenomo, Bambang., Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 1978.

Raharjo, Satjipto., Ilmu Hukum, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rivers, William L., Jay W. Jensen, Theodore Peterson, Media Massa & Masyarakat Modern, Jakarta : Fajar Interpratama Offset, 2004.

Siregar, Asmadi., dalam makalahnya yang disampaikan pada Sidang Dewan Pers, Departemen Penerangan RI, Yogyakarta 26 Mei 1999.

Soesilo, R., Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bogor : Politeia, 1994.

Subekti, R. dan Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta : Pradnya Paramita, 2001.

Tap MPR RI No. XVII/MPR/1998 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

UU No. 11 Tahun 1966, tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Pers.

UU No. 21 Tahun 1982 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 1966 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Pers.

UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

UU No. 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers.

UU No. 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum.

UUD Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 dan Amandemen ke-2.

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Kaban, A. P., M. Hamdan, Ginting, B., & Mahmud Mulyadi. (2022). Analisis Hukum Tentang Kepentingan Umum Menurut Pasal 310 Ayat (3) KUHP di Indonesia sebagai Alasan Penghapusan Pidana dalam Kegiatan Pers. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(2), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i2.8754