Illocutionary Acts in President Rodrigo Duterte ’ s Speech

Abstract. This research attempts to figure out the speech act of President of The Republic of The Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, particularly in identifying types of the Illocutionary act and perlocutionary act in SONA Forum. The researcher is keen to explore Duterte’s speech because Duterte is notorious for his unfavorable remarks. Therefore, by investigating his speech through the analysis of his speech act in the selected speech, the researcher will prove whether the speech contains the perlocutionary acts of insulting or not. This research also focuses on utilizing Searle’s theory on Illocutionary acts exemplifies 5 different types of illocutionary acts namely Assertive which is divided into stating, suggesting, boasting, complaining and claiming. Another type is Directives, which comprises of ordering, commanding, requesting, advising and recommending. Expressive type comprises thanking, congratulating, pardoning, blaming, praising, and condoling. Commisive type includes promising, vowing, and offering. The last type is Declaration. The researchers use descriptive qualitative method by doing transcription of the speech and meticulously analyze every word.


Introduction
In general, language is utilized to bring meaning and tools of social communication. However, to comprehend meaning sometimes is not as easy as imagined. It needs a series of appropriate comprehension in understanding the intended meaning. The failure to locate the right meaning can obviously lead into misunderstanding and create incorrect implicature. In order to possess a clear-cut meaning, the speaker is advised to apply some strategies in conveying the message. Therefore, by understanding the system of meaning in semantics and pragmatics is considered paramount. Language strategy has a very important role in the communication process, and pragmatics offers a guideline for both speaker and listener to attain the goal of communication: being well understood.

Pragmatic
Pragmatics is the study which belief is what is communicated is more than what is said. [1, p. 3] It has consequently more to do with the analysis of what people mean by their utterance that what the words or phrase in those utterance might mean by themselves. To understand speaker's meaning, we might also pay attention to the context .Thus, pragmatics also concern with concern. More clearly, Yule [1] continues that pragmatics should also consider aspects pf context such as who people are talking to, when, where, and under what circumstances that will determine the way they say and what they want to say.

Speech act
According to Searle [2, p. 17-18], the speech act or acts performed in the utterance of a sentences are in general a function of the meaning of the sentence. [3, p. 35-36] in the Searle's book, Speech act an essay in the philoshopy of language, stating that in practice the use of language there are at least three kinds of speech acts.

Searle in Rahardi
These are three kinds of speech acts that now can be describe as follows locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts.
 Locutionary acts are a speech with words, phrases, and sentences, according to the meaning contained by words, phrases, and sentences that. This speech act may be cited as the act of saying something. In a locutionary acts are not question the purpose and function of the speech delivered by the speaker, so the speech of my hand its for example, solely intended to inform the partner said that at the time at hand speaker said that the speech is in a state of itching.
 Illocutionary act is an act of doing something with a purpose and a specific function anyway. Speech act can be considered as the act of doing something. Speech my hand itch spoken speakers is solely intended to inform the partners said that said the speech was itching was lodged in the hands of the speaker but the speaker want hearer to perform certain action associated with itching on his hands. Assertive, the form said that binds speakers at the truth of a proposition disclosed, such as : a. Stating is someone says or writes officially or an action done to express an Speech act is a kind of verbal communication. The word speech acts are derived from two words they are Speech and Act. Speech is the utterance that occurs and act means action.
Furthermore, Searle in: classified the illocutionary speech act in five kinds of utterance each have a communicative function. The fifth forms of speech that showed the from function that can be summarized as follows assertive, directives, expressive, commissive, declaration.
The writer choses to analyze the speech act theory introduced Searle in Rahardi [3]. the SONA event, Quezon City who said that he would punish every person who was proven to use drugs. In one of his speeches, he also said that God was stupid. That is why the writer was interested in researching the content of the speech he delivered.

Findings
The data in this finding section were the assertive of outstanding data, which found after reading speech transcript. Commissive sentence 11,53%, include promising 15, vowing 3, offering 3.

Conclusions
After analyzing the data, it is important to conclude what is elaborated before. So,the conclusion of the research is: Based on the problem of the study in this research, the writer just focused on analyzing the