Access Policy :
2656 - 0674
Visitor Statistics :
Visitor Statistics in detailed:
To maintain the quality of the text and avoid publishing/plagiarism violations in the publishing process, the editorial board establishes the ethics of scientific publications in the International Journal of Ecophysiology. The ethical rules of this publication apply to writers / authors, editors, bestari/reviewer partners, and journal/editor managers. The publication ethics refers to the ethical provisions of scientific publications established by the 2014 Indonesian Institute of Sciences Research Council (MPR).
Reporting; the author must provide information about the process and results of his research to the editor in an honest, clear, and comprehensive manner, and keep the research data well and safely.
Originality and plagiarism; the author is all names included in the team of writers responsible for the contents of the writing. The author must ensure that the manuscript that has been sent / submitted to the editor is the original text, written by himself, originating from his own ideas and ideas, and not plagiarizing the writing or ideas / ideas of others. The author is strictly forbidden to translate the reference sources quoted into the names of others.
Repetition of shipments; the author must inform that the manuscript sent / submitted to the editor is a text that has never been sent / submitted to the publisher of another journal / publication. If there is a "redundancy" of sending the manuscript to another publisher, the editor will reject the text sent by the author.
Author status; the author must inform the editor that the author has competence or qualifications in the field of expertise that is in accordance with the field of publication, namely librarianship. The author who submits the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) who must write an official e-mail address so that if a problem is found in the publishing process the manuscript can be completed / resolved.
Error writing script; the author must immediately inform the editor if errors are found in the writing of the script, both the results of the review and the edits. Writing errors include writing names, affiliations / agencies, citations, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance of the text. If that happens, the author must immediately propose an amendment to the text.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; The author must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript can be processed smoothly and safely.
publication decision; The editor must ensure a thorough, transparent, objective, fair and wise process of reviewing the manuscript. This is the basis of the editor in making decisions on a text, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as the script selection team.
publication information; The editor must ensure that the guidelines for writing the script for the author and other interested parties can be accessed and read clearly, both printed and electronic versions.
Distribution of manuscripts to peer-review (bestari partners); The editor must ensure the reviewer that the manuscript has been submitted to the reviewer for review, and informs the provisions and review process of the text clearly to the reviewer. The review process uses a blind review (does not write the name of the author, the identity is given by numbering)
Objectivity and neutrality; The editor must be objective, neutral and honest in editing the manuscript, regardless of gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, class, and citizenship of the author.
Confidentiality; The editor must maintain every piece of information properly, especially with regard to the privacy of the author and the distribution of the script.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; The editor must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the process of publishing the script runs smoothly and safely.
Objectivity and neutrality; reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is done professionally without distinguishing gender, business side, ethnicity, religion, race, class, and citizenship of the author.
Clarity of reference sources; The reviewer must ensure that the source of the reference / quotation of the text is appropriate and credible (accountable). If errors or irregularities are found in the writing of the source of the reference / quotation, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor to be corrected by the author according to the reviewer's record.
Effectiveness of peer-review; The reviewer must respond to the manuscript that has been sent by the editor and work according to the specified peer-review time (maximum 2 weeks). If you need additional time in reviewing the text, you should immediately report (confirmation) to the editorial secretariat.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the reviewer must understand
© by authors
Int J Ecophysyol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.