Identification and Inventory of Customary (Ulayat) Land among the Pakpak Indigenous Community in Dairi and Pakpak Bharat Regencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v5i01.24916Abstract
This study examines the role and function of customary legal structures within
the Pakpak Indigenous Community, with particular attention to the preservation
of customary norms related to communal land rights, inheritance, marriage, and
kinship systems. The research focuses on Sulang Silima, the highest customary
legal authority among the Pakpak people, which holds jurisdiction in
establishing, interpreting, and enforcing customary norms governing social and
legal relations within the community. This study employs a qualitative
ethnographic approach to obtain an in-depth understanding of how customary
law operates as a living legal system within the Pakpak Indigenous Community.
Through field observation and qualitative analysis, the research explores how the
institutional structure of Sulang Silima regulates internal governance and
decision-making processes, particularly in matters concerning customary land
transactions, inheritance arrangements, and kinship obligations. The findings
reveal that Sulang Silima functions as a central normative institution that
maintains social order and safeguards the collective rights of the Pakpak
Indigenous Community. In practice, a customary leader (kepala adat) may be
appointed from the same clan to serve as an intermediary between the
community and the five elements of Sulang Silima; however, the kepala adat
does not possess decision-making authority within the customary legal
framework and performs primarily ceremonial functions. Furthermore,
customary mechanisms such as pago-pago and ajeg-ajeg play a significant role
in legitimizing customary land transactions through communal deliberation and
ritual validation. The study concludes that the continued existence of Sulang
Silima demonstrates the enduring relevance of indigenous legal systems within
Indonesia’s pluralistic legal order. Recognition and protection of customary
institutions and communal land rights are therefore essential for ensuring legal
certainty, safeguarding indigenous identity, and promoting equitable and
sustainable development within the national legal framework.
Downloads
References
Binnall, J. M. (2019). Jury diversity in the age of mass incarceration: An exploratory mock jury experiment
examining felon-jurors’ potential impacts on deliberations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(4),
345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1528359
Brutu, S., Putri, F. M., Sitepu, E. M. R. B., Tabrani, F. R., Siahaan, P. G., & Perangin-angin, R. B. B. (2023).
Pelindungan Hukum Mejan Sebagai Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Dalam Pengembangan Peraturan
Daerah Di Kabupaten Pakpak Bharat. Media Informasi Penelitian Kabupaten Semarang, 5(2),
144-155.
Fazryn, I., & Dora, N. (2026). Tradisi Ertutur (Orat Tutur Kalak Karo dalam Hubungannya Pembentukan
Karakter) Studi pada Etnik Karo di Desa Jaranguda. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and
Humanities, 9(1), 213-226.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.
Manik, S. S., Martanto, R., & Salim, M. N. (2021). Potensi Tanah untuk Reforma Agraria dalam Kawasan
Hutan di Pakpak Bharat, Sumatera Utara. Tunas Agraria, 4(3), 320-339.
Maryana, R., & Basir, A. (2025). The Effectiveness Of The Application Of Customary Law In Resolving
Communal Land Rights Conflicts. Jilpr Journal Indonesia Law And Policy Review, 7(1), 231-239.
Prinzie, P., Stams, G. J. J. M., Deković, M., Reijntjes, A. H. A., & Belsky, J. (2009). The relations between
parents’ Big Five personality factors and parenting: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 97(2), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015823
Saks Berman, J. (1995). From Chicago to Rainbow Bridge: In search of changing woman. In E. F. Williams
(Ed.), Voices of feminist therapy (pp. 11–25). Harwood Academic Publishers.
Sari, M. P., Wijaya, A. K., Hidayatullah, B., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2023). Penggunaan metode
etnografi dalam penelitian sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 84-90.
Simanjuntak, B. A. (2015). Arti dan Fungsi Tanah bagi Masyarakat Batak Toba, Karo, Simalungun (Edisi
Pembaruan). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Takari, M. (2009, April). Ulos dan sejenisnya dalam budaya Batak di Sumatera Utara: Makna, fungsi, dan
teknologi. In Makalah pada Seminar Antarabangsa Tenunan Nusantara, di Kuantan, Pahang,
Malaysia. Pengajian Media, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya, Pensyarah
Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Windiani, W., & Rahmawati, F. N. (2016). Menggunakan metode etnografi dalam penelitian sosial.
DIMENSI-Journal of Sociology, 9(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Nova Bukit, SH., MH, Boy Laksamana, SH., M.Hum, Afrita, SH., M.Hum, D. Shahreiza, SH., MH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








