PEASANTS' SOCIAL ACTION STRATEGIES IN AGRARIAN CONFLICT (STUDY OF THE INDONESIAN PEASANTS' UNION)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/jpr.v1i1.8192Keywords:
Social Action, Peasant, Agrarian Conflict.Abstract
Movements that are carried out to get resources or desire to achieve social justice, the community needs to regulate the strategies used in carrying out social action. Including for the peasant community in the face of agrarian conflict, as well as SPI (Indonesian Peasants' Union) which organizes peasants' communities facing agrarian conflicts to carry out actions. the struggle for land tenure of conflict. Therefore, it becomes a formulation of the problem in this paper that it is necessary to elaborate and analyze how the dynamics and realities of the use of social action strategies in the face of agrarian conflict by the SPI member peasant community. Using narrative research methods in qualitativeapproaches, this paper is based on the results of research conducted in two SPI base locations, namely Mekar Jaya Village, Wampu Subdistrict. Langkat Regency and Sei Kopas Village Bandar Pasir Mandoge District Asahan Regency, North Sumatra Province. Based on the findings of the study, it is known that the soial action carried out on the study object using strategies that focus on strengthening the mass of action, survives in land occupation, raising support, and weakening of the opposing party.
Downloads
References
Adi, Isbandi Rukminto. 2013. Community intervention and community development; as a community empowerment effort (revised edition) [Intervensi komunitas dan pengembangan masyarakat; sebagai upaya pemberdayaan masyarakat (edisi revisi)]. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Alinsky, Saul D. 1989. Rules for radicals: a practical primer for realistic radicals (Vintage Books Edition) [Aturan untuk radikal: panduan praktis untuk radikal realistis (Vintage Books Edition)] New York: Vintage Books.
Bloomfield, M.J. 2014. Shame campaigns and environmental justice: Corporate shaming as activist strategy [Kampanye malu dan keadilan lingkungan: Perusahaan mempermalukan sebagai strategi aktivis]. Environmental Politics 23, no. 2: 263–81.
Borras, J. 2016. Land politics, agrarian movements and scholar-activism [Politik tanah, gerakan agraria, dan aktivisme-cendekiawan]. Inaugural Lecture, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), The Hague. April 14.
Borras, S.M., and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’ [Perampasan tanah global dan reaksi politik 'dari bawah']. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–47.
Creswell, John W. & Poth, Cheryl N. 2018. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (Fourth Edition) [Inkuiri kualitatif dan desain penelitian: memilih di antara lima pendekatan (Edisi Keempat)]. London: SAGE Publications.
Della Porta, D., and S.G. Tarrow. 2005. Transnational protest and global activism [Protes transnasional dan aktivisme global]. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fauzi, Noer. 1999. Farmers and rulers: the dynamics of Indonesia's agrarian politics [Petani dan penguasa: dinamika perjalanan politik agraria Indonesia]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Glen, Andrew. 1993. “Methods and themes in community practice†in Butcher, Hugh. [“Metode dan tema dalam praktik komunitas†di Butcher, Hugh] et.all. (eds). Community and public policy. London: Pluto Press.
Hall, R., M. Edelman, S.M. Borras Jr, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’ [Perlawanan, persetujuan atau penggabungan? Pengantar perampasan tanah dan reaksi politik 'dari bawah'] . The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 467–88.Mondros, Jacqueline. 2013. “Political, social, legislative action†in Weil Marie [Politik, sosial, tindakan legislatif†dalam Weil Marie] (ed) The handbook of community practice, (Second Edition) Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2014. Social research methods: qualitative dan quantitative approaches [Metode penelitian sosial: pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif] (Seventh Edition). London: Pearson Education Ltd.
Rohmad, Abu. (2008). Paradigm of agrarian conflict resolution [Paradigma resolusi konflik agraria]. Semarang: Walisongo Press.
Rothman, J. 2007. Multi Modes of Intervention at the Macro Level [Multi Mode Intervensi di Tingkat Makro]. Journal of Community Practice 15, no. 4: 11–40.
Sinaga, Randa Putra Kasea and Adi, Isbandi Rukminto. 2020. Economic conditions of peasants in agrarian conflicts (Study on members of the Indonesian Peasants’ Union) [Kondisi ekonomi petani dalam konflik agraria (Studi pada anggota Serikat Petani Indonesia)]. Jurnal Pembangunan Manusia 1, no. 2, Art 4: 151-165.
Temper, L. 2019. From Boomerangs to Minefields and Catapults: Dynamics of Trans-local Resistance to Land-grabs [Dari Boomerang ke Ladang Ranjau dan Ketapel: Dinamika
Perlawanan Trans-lokal terhadap Perampasan Tanah]. Journal of Peasant Studies 46, no. 1: 188–216.
Wiradi, Gunawan. 2009. Circumstances of agrarian issues, agrarian reform and agrarian research [Seluk beluk masalah agraria, reforma agraria dan penelitian agraria]. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
