Formulation of Quality Assurance Social Indicators in Community Forest Health Assessment

Authors

  • Rahmat Safe’i University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Irwan Sukri Banuwa University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Hidayat University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Rudi Hilmanto University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Rommy Qurniati University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/jsi.v7i01.13710

Keywords:

Community Forest, Forest Health, Quality Assurance, Social Indicators, Sustainability

Abstract

Community forests provide benefits to their functions and roles in meeting community needs and environmental sustainability based on economic, social, and ecological perspectives. Social indicators play this role in the sustainability of community forest health. This study aims to obtain a weighted value (quality assurance) of social indicators in assessing the health of community forests. The stages of research carried out included, among others, conducting interviews with questionnaire instruments with respondents, determining the priority scale with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and determining eigenvalues with the Analytic Networking Process (ANP) method. Based on the results of the study, four social indicators can describe the health condition of community forests: education indicators, employment indicators, participation indicators, and institutional indicators. These indicators have the same level of importance, where the eigenvalues obtained do not have significant differences. It means that community forest farmers have realized that social indicators can support environmental sustainability in aspects of forest health. Thus, the weighted values obtained by social indicators from the highest to the lowest are indicator participation (0.29), education indicator (0.27), institutional indicator (0.23), and employment indicator (0.21). The formation of farmer groups needs to be done to improve local institutions. Therefore, they can support community forest management regulations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Widiyanto, H. Basri, and Dahlan, “Potensi dan Strategi Pengembangan Hutan Rakyat di Kabupaten Bireuen Provinsi Aceh,” J. Manaj. Sumberd. Lahan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012.

R. Safe’i, C. Wulandari, and H. Kaskoyo, “Penilaian kesehatan hutan pada berbagai tipe hutan di Provinsi Lampung,” J. Sylva Lestari, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2019, doi: 10.23960/jsl1795-109.

S. F. Rochmah, R. Safe’i, A. Bintoro, and H. Kaskoyo, “Analisis Produktivitas Sebagai Salah Satu Indikator Kesehatan Hutan (Studi Kasus Pada Hutan Rakyat Jati di Kecamatan Natar Kabupaten Lampung Selatan Provinsi Lampung),” J. Hutan Pulau-Pulau Kecil, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 204–215, 2020, doi: 10.30598/jhppk.2020.4.2.204.

D. P. Ansori, R. Safe’i, and H. Kaskoyo, “Penilaian Indikator Kesehatan Hutan Rakyat pada Berbagai Pola Tanam (Studi kasus di Desa Buana Sakti, Kecamatan Batang Hari, Kabupaten Lampung Timur),” Perennial, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.24259/perennial.v16i1.8109.

E. Fauziyah, D. Diniyati, T. S. Widyaningsih, and N. Firdaus, “Pemetaan stakeholder dalam pengelolaan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Ciamis Jawa Barat,” J. Penelit. Agrofor., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 2014.

S. Moog, A. Spicer, and S. Böhm, “The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 469–493, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3.

M. N. Sagita, Akhbar, and H. Muis, “Partisipasi Petani Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Desa Labuan Toposo Kecamatan Labuan Kabupaten Donggala,” J. War. Rimba, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019.

V. Kumar, K. G. Wankhede, and H. C. Gena, “Livelihood of Farmers on Sustainable Basis,” Am. J. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1258–1266, 2015, doi: 10.12691/education-3-10-8.

S. Tapasya, R. Safe’i, M. K. Tsani, and E. Puspasari, “Penilaian Kesehatan Hutan Berdasarkan Indikator Biodiversitas pada Blok Pemanfaatan TAHURA WAR,” J. Sylva Sci., vol. 06, no. 4, pp. 669–678, 2023.

A. N. Syahiib, R. Safe’i, and I. G. Febryano, “The effect of community participation on forest health levels (Case study of Sekar Bahari Mangrove Forest Tourism, Margasari village, Labuhan Maringgai district, East Lampung Regency),” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2619, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.18844/gjs.v7i2.2394.

R. Safe’i, E. N. Puspita, and R. Hilmanto, “Assessment of tree vitality as an indicator of monitoring the health condition of community forest in agroforestry patterns,” Folia For. Pol. Ser. A, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 206–213, 2022, doi: 10.2478/ffp-2022-0020.

R. Rahmawati, D. Hernawan, D. Darusman, and D. Sektiono, “Kinerja Implementasi Tata Kelola Hutan Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak,” Sosiohumaniora, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2019, doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i3.7328.

Supriyanto, K. Stolte, Soekotjo, and A. Gintings, Present Status of Crown Indicators. Di dalam: Forest Health Monitoring to Monitor The Sustainability of Indonesian Tropical Rain Forest. Japan: ITTO dan Bogor: SEAMEOBIOTROP, 2001.

L. M. Zainal, A. Tjoneng, and S. Numba, “Strategi Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat Di Kabupaten Sinjai,” AGROTEK J. Ilm. Ilmu Pertan., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2019, doi: 10.33096/agr.v3i1.69.

T. L. Saaty, Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2005.

R. Pribadi, D. R. Nurrochmat, E. Suhendang, and H. Siregar, “Enhancing the role of the district government in decentralized forest management,” J. Manaj. Hutan Trop., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 2020, doi: 10.7226/JTFM.26.2.114.

C. Tudor, L. Dinca, and C. Constandache, “Benefits Brought by the Abundance and Importance of Forest Fruits from Bistrita-Nasaud County,” Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca. Hortic., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 2020, doi: 10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:2019.0024.

D. Anggraini, A. Malik, and H. Harujanto, “Respon Masyarakat Terhadap Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Desa Mantikole,” J. War. Rimba, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 94–99, 2019.

S. A. Kaisang, Nuraeni, and S. Subaedah, “Strategi Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Kabupaten Luwu Utara,” J. Agrotek, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90–100, 2020, doi: 10.33096/agrotek.v4i2.135.

I. N. Dewi, S. A. Awan, W. Andayani, and P. Suryanto, “Characteristic of Farmer and Contribution of Community Forestry to Farmer’s Income in Kulon Progo,” J. Kehutan., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 86–98, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jik.34123.

D. Diniyati and B. Achmad, “Pengaruh Curahan Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Pendapatan Petani Hutan Rakyat Di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya, Jawa Barat,” J. Hutan Trop., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 274, 2018, doi: 10.20527/jht.v5i3.4795.

W. O. Selfiany and S. Normagiat, “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Hutan Rakyat Di Kabupaten Kubu Raya Kalimantan Barat,” J. Borneo Akcaya, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–30, 2019, doi: 10.51266/borneoakcaya.v5i1.106.

B. Achmad, R. H. Purwanto, S. Sabarnurdin, and Sumardi, “Tingkat Pendapatan dan Curahan Tenaga Kerja Pada Hutan Rakyat di Kabupaten Ciamis,” J. Ilmu Kehutan., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–116, 2015.

E. Anatika, H. Kaskoyo, I. G. Febryano, and I. S. Banuwa, “Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Barat,” J. Sylva Lestari, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2019, doi: 10.23960/jsl1742-51.

D. N. Yanti, I. S. Banuwa, R. Safe’i, C. Wulandari, and I. Gumay Febryano, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat pada KPH Gedong Wani,” J. Hutan dan Masy., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 61, 2017, doi: 10.24259/jhm.v9i2.2861.

A. R. Pratama, S. Budi Yuwono, and R. Hilmanto, “Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat Oleh Kelompok Pemilik Hutan Rakyat Di Desa Bandar Dalam Kecamatan Sidomulyo Kabupaten Lampung Selatan,” J. Sylva Lestari, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 99, 2015, doi: 10.23960/jsl2399-112.

Yusran, K. S. M. Alif, M. Aswan, and A. Sabar, “Analisis Bentuk Kelembagaan Kelompok Tani Hutan Rakyat Desa Gattareng Kecamatan Marioriwawo Kabupaten Soppeng,” J. Tengkawan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2019, doi: 10.26418/jt.v9i1.34763.

R. Hajjar, J. A. Oldekop, P. Cronkleton, P. Newton, A. J. M. Russell, and W. Zhou, “A global analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 216–224, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00633-y.

Published

2024-02-29