Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine and Naive Bayes for Sentiment Analysis on Lecturer Performance

Authors

  • Debora Chrisinta Universitas Timor
  • Justin Eduardo Simarmata Universitas Timor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/jormtt.v5i1.15864

Keywords:

Support Vector Machines, Naive Bayes, Sentiment Analysis

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of sentiment analysis within the Information Technology study program at Universitas Timor, aiming to compare the performance of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB) through 100 iterations. The dataset, comprising 21 instances of negative sentiment and 18 instances of positive sentiment, is analyzed using both methods, with accuracy and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) serving as key metrics. The sample size consists of 39 instances, and the results indicate significant variability in both accuracy and AUC, emphasizing the sensitivity of the models to dataset characteristics and random initialization. On average, SVM outperforms NB, with an accuracy of 0.5846 compared to 0.5075 and an AUC of 0.5916 compared to 0.4607.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

[1]
D. Chrisinta and J. E. Simarmata, “Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine and Naive Bayes for Sentiment Analysis on Lecturer Performance ”, J. of Research in Math. Trends and Tech., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-7, Mar. 2023.