The relationships of emotional intelligence with prosocial and aggressive driving styles: Hubungan kecerdasan emosional dengan gaya berkendara prososial dan agresif

Rizki Moudina

doi:10.32734/psikologia.v16i1.7253

Authors

Rizki Moudina Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/psikologia.v16i1.7253

Keywords:

kecerdasan emosional, gaya berkendara prososial, gaya berkendara agresif, emotional intelligence, prosocial driving style, aggressive driving style

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between emotional intelligence and prosocial and aggressive driving styles through a cross-sectional design (N = 659). The results showed that high emotionally intelligent people had a higher tendency to engage in a prosocial driving style compared with lesser emotionally intelligent people. Unexpectedly, emotional intelligence had no meaningful effect on individuals' tendency to engage in aggressive driving.

Penelitian ini mengkaji hubungan antara kecerdasan emosional dengan gaya mengemudi prososial dan agresif melalui desain potong lintang (N = 659). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa orang yang memiliki kecerdasan emosional tinggi memiliki kecenderungan yang lebih tinggi untuk terlibat dalam gaya mengemudi prososial dibandingkan dengan orang yang kurang cerdas secara emosional. Di luar dugaan, kecerdasan emosional tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kecenderungan individu untuk terlibat dalam mengemudi agresif.

Keywords: emotional intelligence, prosocial driving behavior, aggressive driving behavior

Abstrak. Penelitian ini melihat hubungan kecerdasan emosional dengan perilaku berkendara prososial dan agresif. Dengan menggunakan desain cross-sectional (N = 659), Hasil penelitian ini hanya memperlihatkan peran kecerdasan emosional sebesar 45% terhadap perilaku berkendara agresif yang dapat menciptakan lingkungan berkendara yang aman. Akan tetapi penelitian ini tidak dapat memperlihatkan peran kecerdasan emosional terhadap perilaku berkendara agresif yang menjadi pemicu kecelakaan lalu lintas.
Keywords: kecerdasan emosional, perilaku berkendara prososial, perilaku berkendara agresif

Â

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afolabi, O. A. (2013). Role of Personality types, emotional intelligence and gender difference on prosocial behavior. Pschological Tough 123-139. http://doi10.5964/psyct.v6i1.53

Arnau-Sabates, L., Sala-Roca, J. & Jariot-Garcia, M. (2012). Emotional abilities as predictors of risky driving behavior among a cohort of middle aged drivers. Journal: Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 818-812. http://doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.021.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020) Statistika Transportasi Darat. Retrieved from: https://www.bps.go.id/. Pada Tanggal 20 April 2020.

Bar-On, R. (2005). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence. In P. FernÃ¡ndez-Berrocal and Extremera (Guest Editors), Special Issue on Emotional Intelligence. Psicothema, 17.

Dahlen, E. R., Edwards, B. D., Tubre, T., Zyphur, M. J., & Warren, C. R. (2012). Taking a look behind the wheel: an investigation into the personality predictors of aggressive driving. 45, 1-9. http:// doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.012.

Falahi, S. & Goudarzi, M. (2015). Comparing the emotional intelligence and driving behaviors between the safe and risky drivers of marivan township. Journal of Psychology and Management, 1, 60-69.

Goleman, Daniel. (1995). Kecerdasan emosionalonal : Mengapa Emotional Intelligence Lebih Tinggi Daripada IQ. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Haris, B. P., Houston, J. M., Vazquez, J. A., Smither, J. A., & Harms, A. (2014). The Prosocial Aggressive Driving Inventory (PADI): A Self-Report Measure of Safe and Unsafe Driving Behaviors. Personality and Social Contexts Commons 1-29. http:// doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.023.

Hayley, A. C., Ridder, D. B., Stough, C., Ford. C. T., & Downey. L. A., (2017). Emotional Intellugence and risky driving behavior in adults, Transportation Research, 124-131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.009.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

Kurniawan, R. (2019). Angka Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas du 2019 Meningkat, Diakses dari: http//otomotif.kompas.com/. Pada tanggal 20 Februari 2021.

Kurniawati E. (2017). Angka Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Indonesia Termasuk Tinggi di ASEAN Retrieved from: https://nasional.tempo.co/. Pada tanggal 15 Maret 2021.

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1990).Emotional intelligence. Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG

Schutee, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Liane, D. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4

Surya, M. G. (2019). Ini Provinsi dengan Tingkat Kecelakaan Paling Tinggi. Diakses dari: https://www.liputan6.com/. Pada tanggal 17 Maret 2021

Tasca, L. (2000). A review of the literature on aggressive driving research. Ontario, Canada: Ontario advisory group on safe driving secretariat, road user safety branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation.

Traubman-Ben-Ari, O., & Yehiel, D. (2012). Driving styles and their associations with personality and motivation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 416-422. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.08 .007.