Regulating Illicit Enrichment into Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Legal Reform Regime
Mengatur Pengayaan Tidak Sah ke dalam Reformasi Rezim Hukum AntiKorupsi Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/nlrjolci.v4i2.20794Keywords:
Illicit Enrichment, Anti-Corruption, Legal ReformAbstract
The concept of illicit enrichment refers to a significant increase in a public official’s assets that cannot be reasonably explained in relation to their lawful income. As a legal instrument, illicit enrichment has been adopted in various jurisdictions to complement traditional anti-corruption measures, especially when proving the predicate offenses is difficult due to the sophisticated methods used to conceal corrupt practices. In Indonesia, despite the country’s commitment to combat corruption, the legal framework has yet to formally accommodate the concept of illicit enrichment as a standalone offense. This paper explores the potential of incorporating illicit enrichment into Indonesia’s anti-corruption regime by examining international practices, legal principles, and potential human rights concerns, particularly the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. The analysis indicates that with proper safeguards, illicit enrichment provisions can be aligned with due process and serve as an effective tool in curbing unexplained wealth accumulation among public officials. The study also highlights the challenges Indonesia may face, including legislative reform, institutional readiness, and the need for public acceptance. Nevertheless, the integration of illicit enrichment into national law is not only a legal necessity but also a moral imperative in strengthening public accountability and restoring public trust. This paper concludes that a balanced and rights-respecting approach to illicit enrichment could significantly enhance the effectiveness of Indonesia’s anti-corruption framework.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M. F. (2021). Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 803–823.
Amrullah, A. (2016). Korporasi dan Eksploitasi Sumber Daya Alam [Makalah Pelatihan]. Pelatihan Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi III, MAHUPIKI - Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Andika, P., Ahmad, S., & Rifai, A. (2023). Urgency and Challenges of Illicit Enrichment Regulation in the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v24i1.19577
Asmoro, N., Thalib, H., & Zainuddin. (2025). Asas Pembuktian Terbalik dan Relevansinya dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Pengadilan Negeri Makassar. Journal of Lex Theory, 6(1), 234–243.
Bikelis, S. (2017). Prosecution for illicit enrichment: The Lithuanian perspective. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 20(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2016-0029
Effendi, E., Fernando, Z. J., Anditya, A. W., & Chandra, M. J. A. (2023). Trading in Influence (Indonesia): A Critical Study. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2231621. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2231621
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.249
Guo, Z. (2023). Anti-corruption mechanisms in China after the supervision law. Journal of Economic Criminology, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100002
Hasuri, H., & Mukaromah, M. (2021). Pembuktian Terbalik Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 14(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v14i2.9605
Hutabarat, D. T. H. (2025). Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi, 4(1), 274–283.
Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.
Issa, A., & Alleyne, A. (2018). Corporate disclosure on anti-corruption practice: A study of social responsible companies in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(4), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2017-0045
Iswara, D. A. (2020). Rekonstruksi Regulasi terhadap KPK dalam Pemberantasan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(4), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i4.205
Jawa, D., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Tantangan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 7(2), 1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9507
Körtl, C., & Chbib, I. (2024). Illicit enrichment in Germany: An evaluation of the reformed asset recovery regime’s ability to confiscate proceeds of crime. International Review of Law and Economics, 80, 106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2024.106230
Kusuma, R. (2024). Tantangan dan Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Administrasi Publik di Indonesia. Tugas Mahasisa Fisipol, 1(2), 1–8.
Mahdi, W. L., Garini, M. R., & Azzahra, C. I. (2022). Skema Penerapan Unexplained Wealth: Reformulasi Perampasan Aset pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Al-Jinayah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2022.8.1.85-101
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (13th ed.). Kencana.
Miantoro, B. (2020). Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Di Indonesia. Veritas et Justitia, 6(1), 150–171.
Muhammad Azman Ng, N. B., Ayub, Z. A. B., & Abdul Rahman, R. B. (2022). The Legal Aspect of Illicit Enrichment in Malaysia: Is It a Crime to Be Rich? UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
Muhtar, Z. (2013). Penerapan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian (Omkering van Bewijslast) Pada Peradilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Terdakwa. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v2i2.1940
Muzaki, H. (2021). Illicit Enrichment dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurist-Diction, 4(4), 1431. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i4.28455
Nur, A. (2025). Kelemahan Sistem Hukum dalam Memberantas Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomika Dan Bisnis (JEBS), 5(1), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.47233/jebs.v5i1.2634
Omelchuk, O. M., Haiur, I. Yo., Kozytska, O. G., Prysiazhna, A. V., & Khmelevska, N. V. (2022). Analysis of the Activities of Law Enforcement Authorities in the Field of Combating Crime and Corruption Offences. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 700–716. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2021-0073
Putra, D. A. K., & Prahassacitta, V. (2021). Tinjauan Atas Kriminalisasi Illicit Enrichment Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Dengan Australia. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, 1(1), 43–59.
Putri, N. N., & Katimin, R. H. (2021). Urgensi Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 9(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v9i1.4233
Quah, J. S. T. (2017). Learning from Singapore’s effective anti-corruption strategy: Policy recommendations for South Korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2016-0058
Setiawan, D., Juna, A. M., Fadillah, M. S., Oktarianda, S., Zulkarnen, Z., Rizal, A., & Satrio, I. (2024). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.144
Situmorang, M. (2014). Harmonisasi Hukum Nasional Di Bidang Korupsi Dengan United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.29
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Yusuf, M., Aswanto, A., Sumardi, J., Maskun, M., & Ab Rahman, N. H. (2024). Illicit Enrichment in Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: A Future Strategy. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v31i2.22304
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gregorius Widiartana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
