Hypothetical Scenario between Sirius Corporation vs Magma Logistics based on Singapore and Japan Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/alj.v1i2.11497Keywords:
Corporation Strategies, Jurisdiction, Legal Rights, Notary, Merger and AcquisitionAbstract
Merger and Acquisition (M&A) is still one of key point in international business law. More and more Asian companies doing the transaction to thrive their business. In essence, M&A is a way of transfer of ownership and control in a business or more corporations. Sirius Corporation and Magma Logistic are two main parties in these issues. We will be conducting research and collect information regarding the hypothetical scenario and conclude the findings. There are several important things need to be highlighted such us jurisdiction, legal rights, and corporation strategies in the event of the transactions. Not only that, but timeline for this transaction also play a pivotal point when the M&A deal occur. A series of details event also included in the timeline in order to gain a deep understanding how the companies interact before the M&A occurs. We also compare how Singapore and Japan law and regulation difference with each other in term of M&A deals for Sirius Corporation and Magma Logistic. I believe these two jurisdictions are the most used for companies in Asian. The main reason because they have strict implementation and practical for business to use not like many others Asian countries.
Downloads
References
Poh Mak, Yew. “Will COVID-19 Turbo-Charge M&A and Transformation?†Global Capital Confidence Barometer, 2021. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/ey-capital-confidence-barometer/ccb23/pdfs/ey-c.
“Assignment Task to Provides the General Idea Regarding the M&A Transaction.,†2021.
Chakravarty, Vikram, and Chua Soon Ghee. Interview with Vikram Chakravarty & Chua Soon Ghee, Partner at AT Kearney., n.d.
Chance, Clifford. “Our Insights into M&A Trends.†Clifford Chance, 2012. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/PDFs/Our_insights_into_MandA_trends_global_dynamics_July_2012.pdf.
Chen, Christopher C.H, Wei Zhang, and Wai Yee Wan. “Regulating Squeeze-out Techniques by Controlling Shareholders: The Divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore.†Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1 (2018): 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2017.1316554.
J. Milhaupt, Curtis. “Bull-Dog Sauce for the Japanese Soul? Courts, Corporations, and Communities—A Comment on Haley’s View of Japanese Law.†Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8, no. 2 (2009): 345–61.
K. Koh, Alan, Masafumi Nakahigashi, and Dan Puchniak W. “Land of the Falling “Poison Pill": Understanding Defensive Measures in Japan on Their Own Terms.†University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 41(3) (2020): 687–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332481.
Varottil, Umakanth, and Wai Yee Wan. “Hostile Takeover Regimes in Asia: A Comparative Approach.†NUS Law Working Paper 11 (2018): 1–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167684.
Yee, Wai Yee. “Legal Transplantation of UK-Style Takeover Regulation in Singapore.†Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper, 2017, 1–59.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Mahmuddin, Hilbertus Sumplisius M Wau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.