Tinjauan Yuridis Ditolaknya Pernyataan Pailit Atas Dasar Perlakuan Yang Sama Pada Anak Perusahaan BUMN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/alj.v1i2.12604Keywords:
Bankrupt, BUMN, Parent Company, SubsidiaryAbstract
BUMN in carrying out restructuring carry out the principle of holding companies in maximizing capital. The legal relationship established in the application of the holding company principle between the parent company and its subsidiaries is caused by the takeover of shares by the parent company. BUMN subsidiaries are treated the same as BUMN by fulfilling several conditions as specified in Article 2A paragraph (7) of PP RI Number 72 of 2016. This research is focused on analyzing and analyzing problems related to the legal status of BUMN subsidiaries according to Indonesian law, legal provisions regarding the legal relationship of BUMN holding companies to BUMN subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy, and analysis of the rejection of bankruptcy applications based on equal treatment of BUMN subsidiaries in Decision Number 35/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is a normative research method that is descriptive. Data sources were obtained through primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used is a literature study. This normative research is based on qualitative analysis of secondary data in the form of laws and regulations and library materials. To prevent various interpretations regarding the limitation of bankruptcy application authority for BUMN subsidiaries engaged in the public interest sector, it is necessary to have clear arrangements. Currently, the Bankruptcy Law has not explicitly regulated the authority to apply for bankruptcy, especially for state-owned companies that adopt a holding system, so it is necessary to make changes or additions to the regulations. In Decision Number 35/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst the judge did not consider the aspect of share ownership of the bankruptcy respondent and its source of capital that must be owned entirely by the state against BUMN subsidiaries that are treated the same as BUMN engaged in the public interest when referring to Article 2 paragraph (5) of UU KPKPU.
Downloads
References
Asikin, H Zainal, and Wira Pria Suhartana. Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Menteri. Peraturan Menteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara Tentang Pedoman Pengangkatan Anggota Direksi Dan Anggota Dewan Komisaris Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Nomor PER-03/MBU/2012 Tahun 2012 (2012).
Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. Hukum Perseroan Di Indonesia. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2018.
Bawono, Adi Condro. “Fungsi Penjelasan Dan Lampiran Peraturan Perundang-Undangan,†2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/fungsi-dan-peran-penjelasanlampiran-suatu-peraturan-perundangundangan-cl6386.
Dipura, Aria. “Tinjauan Hukum Mengenai Status Anak Perusahaan BUMN,†2023. https://www.ybp-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Artikel-Tinjauan-Hukum-Mengenai-Anak-Perusahaan-BUMN.pdf.
Disyon, Huta, and Elisatris Gultom. “Telaah Kritis Pelaksanaan Holdingisasi Bumn Dari Perspektif Anti Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 2 (2022).
Dwinanto, Rizky. “Proses Pembentukan Holding Company Di Indonesia.†Hukum Online, Mei 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/proses-pembentukan-iholding-company-i-di-indonesia-cl2389.
Harun, Refly. Hukum BUMN (Badan Usaha Milik Negara). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2020.
Indonesia, Republik. Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 44 Tahun 2005 Tentang Tata Cara Penyertaan Dan Penatausahaan Modal Negara Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dan Perseroan Terbatas (2005).
Perum, BULOG. “Good Corporate Governance,†2023. https://www.bulog.co.id/good-corporate-governance/.
Purwati, Ani. Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori Dan Praktik. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.
Rangga, Wiesma Mara. “Pembentukan Holding Company Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Di Sektor Infrastruktur Ditinjau Dalam Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.†Dharmasisya 2, no. 2 (2022).
Republik Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan No. 002/PUU-I/2003 (2003).
Republik Indonesia, Menteri BUMN, Peraturan Menteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik (Good Corporate Governance) Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 (2011).
Restyana, Chintya Dewi. “Kepailitan Terhadap Anak Perusahaan Dalam Holding Company Badan Usaha Milik Negara.†Ius Quia Iustum 26, no. 2 (2019).
Rokan, Mustapa Khamal. Hukum Perusahaan: Konsep Hukum Positif Dan Islam Serta Berbasis Kasus. Medan: Perdana Publishing, 2020.
Setyawan, Achmad Ardiansyah. “Tata Kelola Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Di Perum Damri Kantor Cabang Surabaya).†Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik 4, no. 2 (2016).
Sulistiowati. Aspek Hukum Dan Realitas Bisnis Perusahan Grup Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, 2010.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Agnes Angelina Siallagan, Mahmul Siregar, Robert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
