Breeds Characterization in Three Turkish Laying Chicken Breeds Based on Egg Characteristics

Authors

  • Widya Pintaka Bayu Putra Research Center for Biotechnology - Indonesian Institute of Science, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ridho Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Ilyas Nugraha Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Republic of Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v4i2.6210

Keywords:

CDA, HCA, PCA, phenotypic, Turkish laying hens

Abstract

Breeds characterization can be performed based on their phenotypic traits. In poultry, the breeds characterization can be performed based on the egg characteristics. This study was carried out to characterize three Turkish laying chicken breeds (30-49 weeks of age) of White Leghorn (WL), Lohmann Brown (LB) and Ataks (AT) based on their characteristics. Total of 90 new stock eggs (30 eggs/breed) from Görukle market, Bursa city, Republic of Turkey were used for analysis. Three statistical analyses of principal component analysis (PCA), canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) analysis were used for breeds characterization. According to egg size index, most of eggs in this study had normal size type. The highest coefficient of correlation (0.99) value was showed between egg weight (EW) and specific gravity (SG). The PCA revealed that four principal components (4PC’s) of egg characteristics capable to explain the total variance of egg characteristics in WL and LB hens about 83.10% and 78.95% respectively. Meanwhile, 3PC’s of egg characteristic in AT were explained about 81.70% of total variance in egg characteristics. The Euclidean distance revealed that LB and AT hens were grouped into similar cluster and WL hen was grouped into different cluster. In conclusion, the egg characteristics in birds study can be used to characterize of WL (73.3%), LB (93.0%) and AT (76.7%) hens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Hardjosubroto. Aplikasi Pemuliabiakan Ternak di Lapangan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana, 1994.

A. A. Apuno, S. T. Mbab, and T. Ibrahim “Characterization of local chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Shelleng and Song local government areas of Adamawa State, Nigeria,” Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6-14, 2011.

S. Alaşahan and A. Günlü, “Determination of egg quality characteristics of different poultry species with digital image analysis,” Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 979-986, 2012.

M. M. A. Aziz and F.S. Al-Hur, “Differentiation between three Saudi goat types using size-free canonical discriminant analysis,” Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 723-735, 2013.

I. I. Adedibu, K. L. Ayorinde, and A.A. Musa, “Multifactorial analyses of morphological traits of extensively reared helmeted guinea fowls Numidia meleagris in Kaduna and Kastina States of Nigeria,” British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, vol. 4, no. 25, pp. 3644-3652, 2014.

G. Khargharia, G. Kadirvel, S. Kumar, S. Doley, P. K. Bharti, and D. Mukut, “Principal component analysis of morphological traits of Assam hill goat in eastern Himalayan India,” Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1251-1258, 2015.

H. Daş, B. Tarım, S. Demir, N. Küçükkent, S. Cengiz, E. Tülek, and V. Aksakal, “Association of IGF and IGFBP2 gene polymorphisms with growth and egg traits in Atak-S laying hens,” Journal of The Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 237-242, 2017.

H. Yıldırım and S. Kaya, “Egg production and quality traits of layers kept in free range housing system,” Greener Journal of Agricultural Science. vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 60-64, 2017.

M. Tutkun, M. Denli, and R. Demirel, “Productivity and egg quality of two commercial layer hibrids kept in free-range system,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture Food Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1444-1447, 2018.

H. O. Ukwu, P. O. Abari, and D. J. Kuusu, “Principal component analysis of egg quality characteristics of Isa Brown layer chickens in Nigeria,” World Scientific News, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 304-311, 2017.

Sh. M. Abdullah and A.S. Shaker, “Principal component analysis of internal egg traits for four genetic groups of local chicken,” Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 699-706, 2018.

S. Liswaniso, N. Qin, X. Shan, I.M. Chimbaka, X. Sun, and R. Xu, “Quality characteristics, phenotyphic correlations and principal component analysis of indigenous free range chicken eggs in Lusaka, Zambia,” International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29-35, 2020.

Giancoli and C. Douglas, Fisika. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2001.

N. Nikolova and D. Kocevski, “Forming egg shape index as influenced by ambient tempertures and age of hens,” Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 119-125, 2006.

P. K. Rath, P. K. Mishra, B. K. Mallick, and N. C. Behura, “Evaluation ofdifferent egg quality traits and interpretation of their mode of inheritance in White Leghorns,” Veterinary World, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 449-452, 2015.

Sarwono, Pengawetan dan Pemanfaatan Telur. 4th ed., Bandung: Penebar Swadaya, 1995

T. M. Wardiny, “Evaluasi hubungan antara indeks bentuk telur dengan persentase DOC yang menetas pada ayam kampung galur Arab,” Laporan Penelitian, Universitas Terbuka, 2002.

T. Suselowati, E. Kurnianto, dan S. Kismiati, “Hubungan indeks bentuk telur dan surface area telur terhadap bobot telur, bobot tetas, daya tetas dan mortalitas embrio pada itik Pengging,” Sains Peternakan, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 24-30, 2019.

R. G. D. Steel and J. H. Torrie, Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw=Hill Book Company, 1962.

Y. Baykalir and U.G. Simsek, “Impact of different rearing systems and age on Bovans White layer’s performance, egg quality traits and synthesis of heat shock protein 70 kDa,” Annals of Animal Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1045-1060, 2018.

A. S. Shaker, H. N. Hermiz, T. R. Al-Khatib, and R. M. Mohammed, “Egg characterization for four genetic groups of Kurdish local chickens,” Food and Nutrition Science, vol. 1, no. pp. 20-25, 2016.

T. A. Hartono, A. W. Puger, and I. M. Nuriyasa, “Kualitas telur lima jenis ayam kampung yang memiliki warna bulu berbeda,” Peternakan Tropika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153-162, 2014.

D. Sreenivas, M. G. Prakash, M. Mahender, and R. N. Chatterjee, “Genetic analysis of egg quality traits in White Leghorn chicken,” Veterinary World, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 263-266, 2013.

A. Jaelani and M. I. Zakir, “Kualitas eksterior dan interior telur komersil pada beberapa peternakan di Kabupaten Tanah Laut,” Prosiding Hasil-Hasil Peternakan, 2016. pp. 1-12. [Online]. Available: https://www.ppj.uniska-bjm.ac.id.

M. Garip, M. Nizamlioglu, E. Kurar, A. Yilmaz, T. Caglayan, S. Dere, Z. Bulut, Z. Ozsensoy, and V. Kurtoglu, “Growth and some period yield characteristics of Denizli × Leghorn crosses F2,” Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 177-182, 2011.

E. E. Moros, D. Darnoko, M. Cheryan, E. G. Perkins, and J. Jerrell, “Analysis of xantophylls in corn by HPLC,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 5087-5090, 2002

Published

2021-08-23

How to Cite

Putra, W. P. B., Muhammad Ridho, & Ilyas Nugraha. (2021). Breeds Characterization in Three Turkish Laying Chicken Breeds Based on Egg Characteristics. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(2), 130 - 141. https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v4i2.6210