Optimizing CCR Platforming Conditions for Platformate Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/jcnar.v7i2.26716Keywords:
CCR Platforming, Platformate, RON, Catalyst Rate, Carbon SpentAbstract
The CCR Platforming unit converts hydrotreated naphtha into platformate as a high-octane gasoline blending component. This study evaluates the effects of reactor temperature and catalyst circulation rate on platformate quality, represented by Research Octane Number (RON), and coke tendency, represented by carbon spent. Operating and laboratory data from reactor section 14-R-601/602/603 were grouped at average temperatures of 510, 515, and 520°C with catalyst rates of 60% and 65%. The variables were processed using average data analysis, graphical interpretation, multiple linear regression, and validation against laboratory RON with a maximum allowable error of 5%. The condition of 520°C at 60% catalyst rate produced the best platformate quality, with average RON of 100.00, but carbon spent was relatively high at 6.207 wt%. Increasing the catalyst rate to 65% at 510°C improved the frequency of RON ≥ 100; however, at 515 and 520°C the RON did not increase significantly because higher feed flow increased reaction load and coke formation. Model validation gave a MAPE of 0.481% and maximum error of 1.751%. These results indicate that CCR Platforming optimization requires balancing RON target, feed load, catalyst circulation, coke formation, and regeneration effectiveness.
Downloads
References
[1] Speight JG. Handbook of petroleum refining. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
[2] Aznárez A, Korili SA, Gil A. Progress and recent novelties in naphtha reforming catalysts. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2024;12(3):113066. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.113066.
[3] Pasandide P, Rahmani M. Simulation and optimization of continuous catalytic reforming: reducing energy cost and coke formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(58):30005-30018. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.151.
[4] Atarianshandiz M, McAuley KB, Shahsavand A. Modeling and parameter tuning for continuous catalytic reforming of naphtha in an industrial reactor system. Processes. 2023;11(10):2838. doi:10.3390/pr11102838.
[5] Zhou J, Zhao J, Zhang J, Zhang T, Ye M, Liu Z. Regeneration of catalysts deactivated by coke deposition: a review. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2020;41(7):1048-1061. doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63552-5.
[6] Nazarova GY, Ivashkina EN, Ivanchina ED, Vosmerikov AV, Vosmerikova LN, Antonov AV. A model of catalytic cracking: product distribution and catalyst deactivation depending on saturates, aromatics and resins content in feed. Catalysts. 2021;11(6):701. doi:10.3390/catal11060701.
[7] Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis. 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
[8] Montgomery DC, Runger GC. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.
[9] Honeywell UOP. General operating manual platforming process unit. Des Plaines: Honeywell UOP; 2018.
[10] PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional RU IV Cilacap. Laporan operasi Unit Platforming Fuel Oil Complex I. Cilacap: PT KPI RU IV; 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Chemical Natural Resources

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










