Performance of Maize-Bean Intercropping Assessed Through Varied Spatial Arrangements and Nutrient Phosphorus Levels in Tanzania

Authors

  • Wilson Masele Department of Crop Sciences and Beekeeping Technology, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • Eliakira Kisetu Department of Soil Science and Geological Studies, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
  • Makwinja Faraja Department of Crop Sciences and Beekeeping Technology, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v5i03.9422

Keywords:

intercropping, N2 fixation, soil fertility

Abstract

Erratic climatic conditions, inherent low fertility and nutrient depletion are among the most important biophysical constraints of food crops production in semi-arid African regions. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of different crop spatial arrangements associated with different levels of Phosphorus on the performance of maize-bean intercropping in Tanzania. The experiment was laid in a complete randomized design of factorial-split arrangement and three factors in different levels. Sowing patterns were randomly assigned to all experimental plots whereas Phosphorus rates were randomly assigned within a specific sowing pattern one after another. Data were subjected to statistical analysis using GenStat software of a generalized treatment structure in a randomized design. Results of the interaction between cropping pattern and the P-rates on beans and maize at a 5% level of significance indicated that grain yield, pods/plant, and biological yield did not differ significantly (P>0.05) while plant height, leaf area index, and plants per plot differed significantly (P<0.05). Intercropping affects the growth and development of component crops depending on the cropping pattern and the nutrients applied. The choice of compatible crops for an intercropping system should not exempt growth habits of the crops, land size, light, water fertilizer utilization. and other agronomic practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Singh and G. Singh, “Influence of soil water regime on nutrient mobility and uptake by Dalbergia sissoo seedlings,” Trop. Ecol., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 337–340, 2004.

F. H. Gutiérrez-Boem and G. W. Thomas, “Phosphorus nutrition and water deficits in field-grown soybeans,” Plant Soil, vol. 207, pp. 87–96, 1999.

E. Betencourt, M. Duputel, B. Colomb, D. Desclaux, and P. Hinsinger, “Intercropping promotes the ability of durum wheat and chickpea to increase rhizosphere phosphorus availability in a low P soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 46, pp. 181–190, 2012.

P. Hinsinger, “Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review,” Plant Soil, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 173–195, 2001.

T. W. Kuyper and P. C. Struik, “Epilogue: global food security, rhetoric, and the sustainable intensification debate,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., vol. 8, pp. 71–79, 2014.

H. Lambers, M. W. Shane, M. D. Cramer, S. J. Pearse, and E. J. Veneklaas, “Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus: matching morphological and physiological traits,” Ann. Bot., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 693–713, 2006.

J. Harmsen, “Measuring bioavailability: from a scientific approach to standard methods,” J. Environ. Qual., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1420–1428, 2007.

Z. Rengel and P. Marschner, “Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere: exploiting genotypic differences,” New Phytol., vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 305–312, 2005.

C. P. Vance, C. Uhde‐Stone, and D. L. Allan, “Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource,” New Phytol., vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 423–447, 2003.

B. T. Nyasasi and E. Kisetu, “Determination of land productivity under maize-cowpea intercropping system in agro-ecological zone of Mount Uluguru in Morogoro, Tanzania,” Glob. J. Agric. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–157, 2014.

E. Ronner and K. E. Giller, “Background information on agronomy, farming systems and ongoing projects on grain legumes in Tanzania,” N2Africa Milestones. Accessed, vol. 17, pp. 9–13, 2013.

E. Kisetu and Z. S. Mtakimwa, “Incorporating pigeon pea compost with Minjingu fertilizer brands to determine their effects on maize production in Morogoro, Tanzania,” World J. Agric. Sci, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 294–298, 2013.

M. Faget et al., “Root–root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses,” Ann. Bot., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 253–266, 2013.

J. A. Postma and J. P. Lynch, “Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures,” Ann. Bot., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 521–534, 2012.

F. Zhang and L. Li, “Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency,” Plant Soil, vol. 248, pp. 305–312, 2003.

M. Latati, M. Pansu, J.-J. Drevon, and S. M. Ounane, “Advantage of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and nitrogen uptake in Northeast Algeria,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013.

T. Abera, T. Tanaand, and L. M. Pant, “Grain yield and LER of maize-climbing bean intercropping as affected by inorganic, organic fertilisers and population density in western Oromiya, Ethiopia,” Asian J. Plant Sci., 2005.

A. E. T. Marandu, E. Semu, J. P. Mrema, and A. S. Nyaki, “Quantification of atmospheric N2 fixed by cowpea, pigeonpea and greengram grown on Ferralsols in Muheza District, Tanzania,” Tanzania J. Agric. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, 2010.

E. T. Mmbaga and D. Friesen, “Adoptable maize/legume systems for improved maize production in northern Tanzania,” in African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 649–654.

M. O. Ijoyah, E. O. Adagba, and T. Iorlamen, “Productivity of okra-maize intercropping system as influenced by varying maize plant densities in Makurdi, Nigeria,” Int. J. Curr. Res, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 59–63, 2012.

M. O. Ijoyah, A. O. Ogar, and G. O. S. Ojo, “Soybean-maize intercropping on yield and system productivity in Makurdi, Central Nigeria.,” Sci. J. Crop Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 49–55, 2013.

M. Tsubo and S. Walker, “Shade effects on Phaseolus vulgaris L. intercropped with Zea mays L. under well‐watered conditions,” J. Agron. Crop Sci., vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 168–176, 2004.

R. S. Rana, B. Singh, and S. C. Negi, “Management of maize/legume intercropping under mid-hill sub-humid conditions,” Indian J. Agric. Res., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 100–103, 2001.

S. M. Gathumbi, G. Cadisch, R. J. Buresh, and K. E. Giller, “Subsoil nitrogen capture in mixed legume stands as assessed by deep nitrogen‐15 placement,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 573–582, 2003.

R. J. Hillocks, C. S. Madata, R. Chirwa, E. M. Minja, and S. Msolla, “Phaseolus bean improvement in Tanzania, 1959–2005,” Euphytica, vol. 150, pp. 215–231, 2006.

P. A. Ndakidemi, F. D. Dakora, E. M. Nkonya, D. Ringo, and H. Mansoor, “Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania,” Aust. J. Exp. Agric., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 571–577, 2006.

G. Hardarson, F. Zapata, and S. K. A. Danso, “Effect of plant genotype and nitrogen fertilizer on symbiotic nitrogen fixation by soybean cultivare,” Plant Soil, pp. 397–405, 1984.

N. Mrkovacki, J. Marinkovi, and R. Acimovic, “Effect of N fertilizer application on growth and yield of inoculated soybean,” Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 48–51, 2008.

A. Lemlem, “The effect of intercropping maize with cowpea and lablab on crop yield,” Her. J. Agric. Food Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 156–170, 2013.

I. H. Alhaji, “Yield Performance of Some Cowpea Varieties under Sole and Intercropping with Maize at Bauchi, Nigeria.,” African Res. Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 278–291, 2008.

Published

2023-03-27

How to Cite

Masele, W., Kisetu, E., & Faraja, M. (2023). Performance of Maize-Bean Intercropping Assessed Through Varied Spatial Arrangements and Nutrient Phosphorus Levels in Tanzania. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(3), 187 - 198. https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v5i03.9422