Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment into Regional Development Planning for Sustainable Development in Bireuen Regency

Authors

  • Rahmi Graduate Program of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Universitas Almuslim, Bireuen, 24261, Indonesia
  • Cut Azizah Graduate Program of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Universitas Almuslim, Bireuen, 24261, Indonesia
  • Ridwan Iriadi Graduate Program of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Universitas Almuslim, Bireuen, 24261, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/jsi.v10i01.26444

Keywords:

Bireuen Regency, Forest Conservation, Policy Integration, Regional Development Planning, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Watershed Governance

Abstract

Regional planning in Bireuen has to respond to basic-service needs while also dealing with pressure on watersheds, forested land, and areas exposed to hydro-meteorological hazards. This paper examines how far the 2025-2029 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is carried into the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (Indonesian term: Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah/RPJMD), rather than remaining a separate compliance document. A qualitative case-study approach was used. The SEA document was coded against five dimensions of integration and traced to programs, indicators, annual targets, agency responsibilities, and spatial references. Interviews of eight informants were used to interpret gaps in implementation. Among the 266 SDG indicators screened in the SEA, the largest problem was the absence or weakness of data, not poor performance alone. Several recommendations could be followed into RPJMD policy directions and programs, but the chain became less complete when ecological baselines, location-specific safeguards, financing, and monitoring responsibilities were examined. This weakness was most evident for forest cover, catchment rehabilitation, recharge areas, and land-use control. Drawing on these findings, the study proposes a staged SEA-RPJMD traceability model that links environmental diagnosis with planning choices, spatial safeguards, responsible agencies, budget decisions, and annual review. The model offers a practical way to keep the Peusangan and Jambo Aye catchments, forest-cover functions, and green open-space controls visible in regional development decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1987.

[2] H. E. Daly and J. Farley, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2011.

[3] United Nations, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY, USA: United Nations, 2015.

[4] C. Allen, G. Metternicht, and T. Wiedmann, “Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries,” Sustainability Science, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1453–1467, 2018.

[5] Republic of Indonesia, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2004 concerning the National Development Planning System. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2004.

[6] Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Regulation Number 86 of 2017 concerning Procedures for Regional Development Planning, Control, and Evaluation. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017.

[7] Republic of Indonesia, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2009.

[8] Republic of Indonesia, Government Regulation Number 46 of 2016 concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016.

[9] Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Regulation Number 7 of 2018 concerning the Preparation and Implementation of Strategic Environmental Assessment in Regional Medium-Term Development Plans. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018.

[10] Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, Regulation Number 13 of 2024 concerning the Implementation of Government Regulation Number 46 of 2016. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2024.

[11] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Applying Strategic Environmental Assessment: Good Practice Guidance for Development Co-operation. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2006.

[12] M. R. Partidário, Strategic Environmental Assessment Better Practice Guide: Methodological Guidance for Strategic Thinking in SEA. Lisbon, Portugal: Portuguese Environment Agency, 2012.

[13] M. Eggenberger and M. R. Partidário, “Development of a framework to assist the integration of environmental, social and economic issues in spatial planning,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 201–207, 2000.

[14] M. Nilsson and H. Dalkmann, “Decision making and strategic environmental assessment,” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 305–327, 2001.

[15] H. Runhaar and P. P. J. Driessen, “What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2–14, 2007.

[16] G. Stoeglehner, A. L. Brown, and L. Kørnøv, “SEA and planning: Ownership of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2009.

[17] M. Fundingsland Tetlow and M. Hanusch, “Strategic environmental assessment: The state of the art,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2012.

[18] V. Lobos and M. Partidário, “Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 48, pp. 34–46, 2014.

[19] J. Zhang, L. Kørnøv, and P. Christensen, “A historical review of the cumulative science in strategic environmental assessment effectiveness,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 83, Art. no. 106412, 2020.

[20] A. Jiménez-Aceituno, G. D. Peterson, A. V. Norström, G. Y. Wong, and A. S. Downing, “Local lens for SDG implementation: Lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa,” Sustainability Science, vol. 15, pp. 729–743, 2020.

[21] T. A. Reuter, “SDG localization: Finding the middle ground to top-down and bottom-up approaches with a digital networking platform,” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol. 19, no. 1, Art. no. 2207372, 2023.

[22] N. D. Mutiarani and D. Siswantoro, “The impact of local government characteristics on the accomplishment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 7, no. 1, Art. no. 1847751, 2020.

[23] Government of Bireuen Regency, Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Bireuen Regency Regional Medium-Term Development Plan 2025–2029. Bireuen, Indonesia: Government of Bireuen Regency, 2025.

[24] BPS-Statistics of Bireuen Regency, Bireuen Regency in Figures 2023. Bireuen, Indonesia: BPS-Statistics of Bireuen Regency, 2023.

[25] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018.

[26] G. A. Bowen, “Document analysis as a qualitative research method,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, 2009.

[27] H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005.

[28] K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018.

[29] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

[30] L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, pp. 1–13, 2017.

[31] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2014.

[32] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2015.

[33] C. Azizah, H. Pawitan, Nuraida, H. Satriawan, R. Abbas, S. Robo, and Misnawati, “Karakteristik hidrologi dan dampaknya terhadap banjir Daerah Aliran Sungai Jambo Aye di Aceh Indonesia (Hydrological characteristics and its impact on flood Jambo Aye Basin in Aceh Indonesia),” Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2021, doi: 10.20886/jppdas.2021.5.2.171-184.

[34] C. Azizah, H. Pawitan, B. D. Dasanto, I. Ridwansyah, and M. Taufik, “Risk assessment of flash flood potential in the humid tropics Indonesia: A case study in Tamiang River basin,” International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–73, 2022, doi: 10.1504/IJHST.2022.119236.

[35] F. Ilhamni, C. Azizah, H. Satriawan, N. Nuraida, S. Robo, M. Misnawati, and R. Ismy, “Mapping analysis for vulnerable areas and erosion rate of Laut Tawar Lake, Peusangan Watershed,” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 3617–3626, 2023, doi: 10.15244/pjoes/163499.

[36] C. Azizah, C. Nofita, H. Satriawan, R. Iriadi, S. Robo, and Misnawati, “Land-use changes and their impact on runoff coefficient and flood volume in the Keureuto Watershed, Aceh Province,” Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 105–120, 2025, doi: 10.59465/jppdas.2025.9.1.105-120.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

[1]
Rahmi, C. Azizah, and R. Iriadi, “Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment into Regional Development Planning for Sustainable Development in Bireuen Regency”, J. Sylva Indonesiana, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 1–13, Oct. 2026.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.