Animacy in Indonesia Folktales
Keywords:
Animation, Semantics, Indonesian Folklore, Typology, Inanimate NounAbstract
Animacy is a semantic property of a noun that describes whether the referent of the noun is alive or inanimate, and to what extent it is conscious in acting. The purpose of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of how the concept of animation is applied in Indonesian folklore and how it reflects the views of Indonesian society. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach supported by simple quantitative analysis (percentages) to identify and classify the elements found in Indonesian folklore. The data used are the most popular folklore texts in Indonesia, namely: The Legend of Lake Toba (North Sumatra), Malin Kundang (West Sumatra), Timun Emas (Central Java), Tangkuban Perahu (West Java), and Roro Jonggrang (Central Java) which come from various available oral and written sources. Furthermore, the data will be analyzed by mapping the elements of animation contained in the story and categorizing them based on typologies that are relevant to the study of animation in folklore. The results of this study are that Indonesian folklore consists of elements of flora/fauna life as much as 11.11%, human 33.33%, inanimate nouns as much as 40%, and supernatural as much as 15.15%. The inanimate noun element is the most dominant element. This suggests that Indonesian folklore links the environment/place as the main element in building the story.
Downloads
References
Alamry, A., & Sabourin, L. (2017). L1 and Animacy Effects in The Acquisition of Gender
Agreement in Arabic. Proceedings of the 2017 annual conference of the Canadian
Linguistic Association.
Atkinson, E., Apple, A., Rawlins, K., & Omaki, A. (2016). Similarity of Wh-Phrases and
Acceptability Variation in Wh-Islands. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 2048.
Bascom, WR (1965).The forms of folklore: Process narratives. The Journal of American Folklore,
78(307), 3-20.
Belletti, A., Chesi, C., (2011). Relative Clauses from the Input: Syntactic Considerations on
A Corpus-Based Analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers),
4.
Bentea, Anamaria, Stephanie Durrleman, and Luigi Rizzi. (2016). Refining Intervention:
The Acquisition of Featural Relations in Object A-bar Dependencies. Language 169,
21-41.
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (2nd
ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (2nd
ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Weskott, T. (2011). Animacy effects on Crossing Wh-movement in Germany. Linguistics,
49(4), 657-683.
Fortin, C. (2018). On The Left Periphery in Indonesian. In Chung, Sandy, Daniel Finer, Ileana Paul,
and Eric Potsdam (eds.). Proceedings of the Sixteenth Meeting of the Formal Austronesians
Linguistics Association.
Friedmann, N. & Lavi, H. (2006). On The Order of Acquisition of A-Movement, Wh-
Movement, and VC Movement. In A. Belletti, E. Bennatu, C. Chesi, ED
Domenico, & I. Ferrari (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development, 211-217
Gennari, Silvia P., & MacDonald, Maryellen C. (2008). Semantic Indeterminacy in Objects
Relative Clauses.Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 161–87.
Gennari, Silvia P., & MacDonald, Maryellen C. (2009). Linking Production and
Comprehension Processes: The Case of Relative Clauses. Cognition, 111, 1–
23.
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., N. Sagarra, and J. Herschensohn. (2013). Processing of Gender
and Number Agreement in Late Spanish Bilinguals. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 17(5), 607-627.
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford & Cambridge:
Blackwell Publishers.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory Second Edition.
Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Irmawati, B., Shindo, Y., & Matsumoto, H. (2015). A Dependency Annotation Scheme for
English.The 21st Annual Meetings of the Association for Natural Language
Processing
Krause, E., & von Heusinger, K. (2019). Gradient Effects of Animation on Differential Objects
Marking in Turkish. Open Linguistics, 5(1), 171-190.
Kwon, N., Ong, D., Chen, H., & Zhang, A. (2019). The Role of Animacy and Structural
Information in Relative Clause Attachment: Evidence from Chinese.Frontiers in
psychology, 10, 1576.
Mak, W.M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The Influence of Animacy on Relative
Clause Processing.Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50-68.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2837
Prihatini, A. (2019). Semantic Network of The Word Association in the Field of Law.
LITERA, 18(3), 430-446.
Rathgeber, W. (1981). Volksmärchen und ihre Typologie. Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Rosenbach, A. (2008). The discourse functions of word order variation in German. In The
Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 154-175). Publisher.
Sibarani, TA (1984). Function and structure of folklore. Balai Pustaka Publisher.
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Dimitrakopoulou, Maria. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis:
Evidence from Wh-Interrogatives in Second Language Acquisition. Second
Language Research, 23(2), 215-242. ff10.1177/0267658307076546ff. ffhal-00570727ff
Vicente, L. (2013). On the Causes of Superiority Effects in Spanish: Preliminary Results and
Prospects.Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 12, 283-300.
Wagers, M.W., & Pendleton, E. (2016). Structuring Expectation: Licensing Animacy in
Relative Clause Comprehension.Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast conference
on formal linguistics, 29-46.
Wiltschko, M., & Ritter, J. (2015). The role of syntax in linguistic typology. In A. Editor & B.
Editor (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 870-890). Publisher.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
