Review of the Applicability of Advocate Immunity Rights in Indonesia
A Comparative Study with the Australian Solicitor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/nlrjolci.v1i1.16858Keywords:
advocates, compliance theory, immunity rights, law enforcersAbstract
Advocates are one part of the Law Enforcement Officers who have rights and obligations that must be obeyed by each party. Advocate Immunity Rights which is a right that states advocates cannot be prosecuted civilly or criminally in carrying out their professional duties in good faith for the benefit of client defense. Problems are how is the influence of legal sociology in supporting the professional duties of advocates? and how is the applicability of advocate immunity rights in accordance with the indonesian advocates law and the australian solicitor studied based on legal compliance theory? The purpose of this study is to answer the various problems of this research. Normative juridical method with a comparative study approach in Indonesia and Australia. The essential influence of legal sociology in supporting the professional duties of advocates is because advocates will be faced with diverse community cultures. Legal compliance theory of advocate immunity rights in accordance with Advocate Law Number 18 of 2003 is still often ignored by other law enforcement officials. Advocates are still often criminalized in carrying out professional duties, namely defending their clients, unlike in Australia which prioritizes immunity rights. This is a special concern for each of the law enforcement institution to respect each other, in order to create fair law enforcement
Downloads
References
Aulia, M. Z. (2019). Hukum Pembangunan dari Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja: Mengarahkan Pembangunan atau Mengabdi pada Pembangunan? Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.363-392
Bernstein, A. (2019). Minding the gaps in lawyers’ rules of professional conduct. Oklahoma Law Review, 72(1), 125–148.
Bolin, R. (2012). Risky mail: Concerns in confidential attorneyclient email. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 81(2), 601–655. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2013502
Byrne, C. (2018). A Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Future of Advocates’ Immunity in Australia. Journal of Judicial Administration, 28(2), 98–121.
Cahyani, F., Junaidi, M., Arifin, Z., & Sukarna, K. (2021). Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i2.2253
Calvin, J., & Pratiwi, M. G. (2018). Dalam Melakukan Pekerjaan. 2(2), 691–699.
Chi, L. L., Lan, N. T., & Ngan, N. H. (2023). The Presence of the Defense Lawyer in Vietnam’s Criminal Justice System: Substantive or Cosmetic? Hasanuddin Law Review, 9(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i1.4121
Dedihasriadi, L. O., & Nurcahyo, E. (2020). Pancasila Sebagai Volkgeist: Pedoman Penegak Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Integritas Diri dan Keadilan. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p10
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Efendi, Aan; Susanti, D. O. (2022). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Quo Vadis Perlindungan Konsumen Pangan Rekayasa Genetika. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Eka Yudha Saputra. (2023). Kamaruddin Simanjuntak: Kenapa Saya Jadi Tersangka dalam Hal Bela Klien? Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1759602/kamaruddin-simanjuntak-kenapa-saya-jadi-tersangka-dalam-hal-bela-klien
Gayo, S. (2022). Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions. Sasi, 28(4), 599. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071
Groves, M., & Derham, M. (2019). Should Advocates ’ Immunity Continue ? Melbourne University Law Review, 28, 80–124.
Hadiyanto, Alwan; Alam, A. S. (2023). The Advocates’ Immunity Rights In Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System. JPH: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(2), 327–338. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/33463
Hutomo, P., & Soge, M. M. (2021). Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer. Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 1(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.1.46-68
International Legal Digest: Lawyers’ Protection and States’ Obligations, 1 (2020).
Jaya Putra, M. (2019). Problematics in Handling Criminal Offence on Poor Communities by Advocate (A Study on Gunung Sugih District Court). FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no1.1406
Khalid, A. (2019). Upaya Kriminalisasi Terhadap Advokat Dalam Menjalankan Profesi Hukum. Jentera Hukum Borneo, 03(18), 136–170. http://ejournal.uay.ac.id/index.php/jhb
Legowo, N. A., & Puspitosari, H. (2023). Settlement of Any Cases By Advocates Against Clients. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 8(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v9i1.2526
Lie, G., Ramadhan, D. A., & Redi, A. (2023). Komisi Independen Perlindungan Data Pribadi: Quasi Peradilan Dan Upaya Terciptanya Right To Be Forgotten Di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i2.530
Lubis, M. M., & Pratiwi, D. T. (2019). Analisis Hak Imunitas Hukum Profesi Advokat dalam Penanganan Kasus Pidana. Binamulia Hukum, 8(2), 173–184.
Matnuh, H. (2018). Law as a Tool of Social Engineering. 147(Icsse 2017), 118–120. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.28
Mauluna, A. E., & Husodo, J. A. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Pengaturan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. 6(1), 1–19.
Mcleod, B. S. (2012). The Milgram Experiment. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 3311–3311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_6025
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Moore, J. (2020). Attorney–client communication in public defense: a qualitative examination. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(6), 908–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419861672 28
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
Orozco, D. (2020). A systems theory of compliances law. Journal of Business Law, 22(2), 246–301. https://perma.cc/366X-9U2S]
Rogers, J., & Bell, F. (2019). The Ethical AI Lawyer: What is Required of Lawyers When They Use Automated Systems? Law, Technology and Humans, 1(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1324
Saputra, E. Y. (2023, August 30). Dituduh Langgar UU Advokat, Bareskrim Sebut Penyidik Tangani Perkara Alvin Lim Sesuai SOP. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1765995/dituduh-langgar-uu-advokat-bareskrim-sebut-penyidik-tangani-perkara-alvin-lim-sesuai-sop
Susanti, E., & Rahardjo, E. (2018). Hukum dan Kriminologi (Issue 1). AURA CV Anugrah Utama Raharja. https://jdih.situbondokab.go.id/barang/buku/Hukum dan Kriminologi Buku Ajar (Emilia Susanti, S.H., M.H. Eko Rahadjo, S.H. etc.) (z-lib.org).pdf
Susanto, H., Lim, R., Solavide, S. K., & Karo, R. K. (2023). Pertentangan Hak Imunitas Advokat dengan Obstruction of Justice dalam Putusan Nomor 9 / Pid . Sus /TPK/2018/PN.JKT.PST. Proceeding: 5TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE on Law Studies, 648–662. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ncols/article/view/2722
Uus Sunandar, & Abdal. (2021). Law Enforcement Effects on Social Discipline and Community Social Integration in Garut District. International Journal of Social Science, 1(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v1i4.720
Wolski, B. (2020). Confidentiality and privilege in mediation: Concepts in need of better regulation and explanation. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 43(4), 1552–1594. https://doi.org/10.53637/lodc7766
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
