The function of controlling constituents for subject deletion in subordinative constructions in Acehnese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v4i1.20360Keywords:
Controlling Constituent, Subject Omission, Subordinative Construction, Acehnese LanguageAbstract
This study aims to find the function of controlling constituents in Acehnese subordinative constructions. The function in question is “places” in the syntactic structure that will be filled with specific categories. This research employs qualitative research methods, incorporating note-taking and document review techniques. The data is presented in written text, rather than numbers or statistics. The data is obtained from various sources, such as sentences in Aceh language books, Aceh grammar books, and Aceh language dictionaries. The results show that controlling constituents in Acehnese subordinative constructions occupy only the functions of subject, object, complement, and adverb. These functions play a crucial role in connecting the main clause and the subordinate clause, thereby determining the overall meaning of the sentence. The subject-controlling constituent, as subject, object, complement, or adverb, plays a direct role in connecting the main clause and the subordinate clause. The subject in the subordinate clause refers to the subject, object, complement, and adverb in the main clause so that the subject in the subordinate clause can be omitted. It can be said that all these syntactic functions play an important role in controlling the subject in the subordinate clause.
Downloads
References
Alamiri, Z. & Mickan, P. (2013). Ellipsis in the Quranic Story of Joseph: A Textual View. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6: 61–75.
Alwi, H., M. Moeliono, A. & Lapoliwa, H. (2017). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kemendikbud.
Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chear, A. (1994). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chen, W. (2016). Ellipsis and Cognitive Semantics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11): 2134.
Flick, U. dkk. (2004). A Companion To Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Kane, H. (2020). Cross-linguistic Differences in English and French VP-Ellipsis. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(11): 55–67. Tersedia di www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt.
Moleong, L.J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Neuman, W.L. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and QuantitApproaches. USA: Pearson Education.
Prabawa, A.H. (2007). Subordinator Relasi Temporal dalam Kalimat Majemuk Bertingkat.
Qizi, M.S.A. (2022). Ellipsis As A Linguistic and Language Phenomenon. 2(14): 710–714. Tersedia di https://bestpublication.org/index.php/ozf/issue/view/34.
Sasangka, S.S.T.W. (2019). Kalimat. Jakarta Timur: Pusat Pembinaan Bahasa dan Sastra.
Setiawan, T. & Santoso, J. (2021). Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.
Susandhika, I.G.N.M., Darma Laksana, I.K. & Suparwa, I.N. (2016). Fungsi, Kategori, dan Peran Sintaksis dalam Talk Show One “Indonesia Lawyers Club” di TV One.
Verhaar, J.W.M. (1983). Pengantar Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Yunaidi, S. (2014). Analisis Konjungsi Subordinatif pada Cerpen dalam Surat Kabar Solopos Edisi Mingguan Bulan Mei 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal Linguistics of Sumatra and Malay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.