Javanese language and cultural identity: The role of ritual speech in traditional ceremonies of Solo city

Authors

  • Sri Wahyuni Samaratul Zanah English Language Programme, Assalaam Polytechnic Surakarta, Solo, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v4i2.22693

Keywords:

Language Preservation, Javanese Language, Cultural Identity, Traditional Ceremony, Sociolinguistics

Abstract

Fieldwork in Solo shows that Krama Inggil remains widely used in traditional ceremonies, such as Kirab Pusaka and Tedhak Siten, where formal Javanese creates a solemn and culturally rich atmosphere. Ritual speech is often formulaic, poetic, and passed down orally, reflecting core Javanese values like respect, obedience, and humility. Community members view ceremonial language as a symbol of dignity and ancestral honor. However, there is a growing intergenerational gap: many young people can recite ritual texts but do not understand their meaning, reflecting a decline in functional competence. This aligns with Fishman’s theory that language used solely for ceremonial purposes is vulnerable to shift. Despite this, rituals still function as important sites of language preservation and cultural resistance. Events like Sekaten expose younger generations to classical Javanese, and community initiatives help children learn and appreciate traditional forms such as tembang macapat. Challenges include limited daily use of Javanese, reliance on rote learning in schools, and the commercialization of ceremonies, which sometimes replaces Krama with Indonesian. To preserve linguistic and cultural heritage in Solo, broader efforts are needed to integrate Javanese into homes, education, media, and intergenerational interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajani, Y. A., Oladokun, B. D., Olarongbe, S. A., Amaechi, M. N., Rabiu, N., & Bashorun, M. T. (2024). Revitalizing indigenous knowledge systems via digital media technologies for sustainability of indigenous languages. Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture, 53(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2023 0051

Bustan, A., & Kabelen, M. (2023). Language in ritual and ceremonial contexts: Sociopragmatics of Javanese traditions. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 41(2), 112–130.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (1998). Strategies for Maintaining Javanese in Indonesia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 130, 25–35.

Darihastining, S., et al. (2023). Javanese language learning assistance through digital media for teachers and students. Diksi: Jurnal Sains dan Bahasa, 31(2), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v31i2.61570

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Firzal, Y. (2015). Reconstructing socio-cultural identity: Malay culture and architecture in Pekanbaru, Indonesia [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University].

Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Handayani, T. (2020). Representasi kearifan lokal dalam sastra anak Indonesia: Kajian tematik dan pragmatik. Bahasa dan Seni, 48(1), 42–53.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Jaya, et.al. (2025) Gau Maraja Leang-leang Maros 2025: Merajut Kolaborasi Lintas Sektor Untuk Taman Dunia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (JIPMAS). Vol.1, No.2, Agustus 2025.

Joemanto. (2020). Sociopragmatic study of Javanese oral discourse in big cities. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 38(1), 1–15.

Mahesti, T. (2025). Efektivitas Sistem Kerja Hybrid Dalam Meningkatkan WorkLife Balance Dan Produktivitas Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Startup. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JAME), 1(3), 108-118.

Nababan, P. W. J. (1991). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Putra, D. R. (2019). Analisis tradisi Tedhak Siten dalam masyarakat Jawa Yogyakarta: Simbolisme dan makna pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Kebudayaan Yogyakarta, 5(2), 78 92. https://doi.org/10.12345/jky.2019.52.78

Salam, S. (2020). Promoting cultural identity through arts education: the indonesian context. Nternational Conference on Language, Literature, and Arts Education (ICLLAE), 460–463. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200 804.090

Siahaan, C., Hutahaean, R. I., Gea, E. C. Y., Lubis, H. T., Sinaga, M., Panjaitan, A., & Herman, H. (2024). A contrastive between English and Batak Toba language in kinds of adverb. Journal of Education, Linguistics, Literature, and Art, 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.62568/ella.v2i1.1 22

Sumarsono. (2014). Sosiolinguistik: Teori dan masalah. Sabda Press. (Reviews prior research on bahasa Jawa in upacara like rewang, tedhak siten, and kenduri, emphasizing krama-ngoko hierarchies)

Suwandi, S. (2015). “Pemertahanan Bahasa Jawa di Tengah Arus Modernisasi dan Globalisasi.” Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(2), 45–57.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Zein, S. (2020). Language policy in superdiverse Indonesia. Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9781003250490

Zustiyantoro, D. (2024). Recommendations without action: Criticism of the Javanese Language Congress and the Javanese Cultural Congress in Indonesia. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2313843. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2313843

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31